That old-time whistle
There are many negative things you can say about Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee and the GOPís de facto intellectual leader. But you have to admit that heís a very articulate guy, an expert at sounding as if he knows what heís talking about.
So itís comical, in a way, to see Ryan trying to explain away some recent remarks in which he attributed persistent poverty to a ďculture, in our inner cities in particular, of men not working and just generations of men not even thinking about working.Ē He was, he says, simply being ďinarticulate.Ē How could anyone suggest that it was a racial dog-whistle? Why, he even cited the work of serious scholars ó people like Charles Murray, most famous for arguing that blacks are genetically inferior to whites. Oh, wait.
Just to be clear, thereís no evidence that Ryan is personally a racist, and his dog-whistle may not even have been deliberate. But it doesnít matter. He said what he said because thatís the kind of thing conservatives say to each other all the time. And why do they say such things? Because American conservatism is still, after all these years, largely driven by claims that liberals are taking away your hard-earned money and giving it to Those People.
Indeed, race is the Rosetta Stone that makes sense of many otherwise incomprehensible aspects of U.S. politics.
We are told, for example, that conservatives are against big government and high spending. Yet even as Republican governors and state legislatures block the expansion of Medicaid, the GOP angrily denounces modest cost-saving measures for Medicare. How can this contradiction be explained? Well, what do many Medicaid recipients look like ó and Iím talking about the color of their skin, not the content of their character ó and how does that compare with the typical Medicare beneficiary? Mystery solved.
Or weíre told that conservatives, the Tea Party in particular, oppose handouts because they believe in personal responsibility, in a society in which people must bear the consequences of their actions. Yet itís hard to find angry Tea Party denunciations of huge Wall Street bailouts, of huge bonuses paid to executives who were saved from disaster by government backing and guarantees. Instead, all the movementís passion, starting with Rick Santelliís famous rant on CNBC, has been directed against any hint of financial relief for low-income borrowers. And what is it about these borrowers that makes them such targets of ire? You know the answer.
One odd consequence of our still-racialized politics is that conservatives are still, in effect, mobilizing against the bums on welfare even though both the bums and the welfare are long gone or never existed. Santelliís fury was directed against mortgage relief that never actually happened. Right-wingers rage against tales of food stamp abuse that almost always turn out to be false or at least greatly exaggerated. And Ryanís black-men-donít-want-to-work theory of poverty is decades out of date.
In the 1970s it was still possible to claim in good faith that there was plenty of opportunity in America, and that poverty persisted only because of cultural breakdown among African-Americans. Back then, after all, blue-collar jobs still paid well, and unemployment was low. The reality was that opportunity was much more limited than affluent Americans imagined; as the sociologist William Julius Wilson has documented, the flight of industry from urban centers meant that minority workers literally couldnít get to those good jobs, and the supposed cultural causes of poverty were actually effects of that lack of opportunity. Still, you could understand why many observers failed to see this.
But over the past 40 years good jobs for ordinary workers have disappeared, not just from inner cities but everywhere: adjusted for inflation, wages have fallen for 60 percent of working American men. And as economic opportunity has shriveled for half the population, many behaviors that used to be held up as demonstrations of black cultural breakdown ó the breakdown of marriage, drug abuse, and so on ó have spread among working-class whites, too.
These awkward facts have not, however, penetrated the world of conservative ideology. Earlier this month the House Budget Committee, under Ryanís direction, released a 205-page report on the alleged failure of the War on Poverty. What does the report have to say about the impact of falling real wages? It never mentions the subject at all.
And because conservatives canít bring themselves to acknowledge the reality of whatís happening to opportunity in America, theyíre left with nothing but that old-time dog whistle. Ryan wasnít being inarticulate ó he said what he said because itís all that heís got.
Paul Krugman is a columnist for The New York Times.