• Candor in talk of end of life
    April 22,2013
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
     
    Candor in talk of end of life

    Recent issues of local papers have carried letters from writers supporting the so-called “death with dignity” bill. What is missing from these letters is the one element essential to full debate of a controversial issue: candor. The writers speak of “personal option,” or “the freedom of the individual to direct his own life,” and no one mentions the elephant in the living room: physician-assisted suicide. The “end-of-life choice” under debate would be a legally constituted right to commit suicide by ingesting an overdose of barbiturates prescribed by a doctor.

    Now suicide can be a private matter, if it is done without consultation or help. But if the state and the medical community collaborate in providing a suicide service, even a restricted one, then it is very much a public matter. Here are the larger issues we need to discuss openly: shall the state of Vermont pre-approve suicide for some citizens and authorize the medical profession to facilitate it? What would be the consequence for vulnerable populations — the elderly, the chronically ill, the disabled, and the depressed — of thus lifting the suicide taboo? Is personal expediency the basis of sound public policy?

    I ask the supporters of this measure to call a spade a spade so that we can have a truly honest discussion of such a serious matter.

    GRACE WEBER

    Weybridge
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
    2 Comments
    MORE IN Letters
    Dear Rutland: This is getting really obnoxious and boring. Full Story
    Those currently supporting Don Chioffi for Rutland Town Select Board, are doing so because of the... Full Story
    In reference to the editorial printed in the Feb. Full Story
    More Articles