Bill would give towns more say on windBy Bob Kinzel
Vermont Public Radio | March 16,2013The Vermont Senate will debate a bill next week that would significantly change the way renewable-energy projects are reviewed by the state.
The bill would give towns much more authority to ban projects.
Backers say the bill is needed because they don’t think the Public Service Board pays enough attention to the views of some towns where new energy projects have been proposed.
The board can approve a project, even if it’s strongly opposed by residents of a town, if the board finds the project is “in the greater public good.” The proposed bill would require the board to give greater weight to a town’s view.
Sen. Joe Benning, R-Caledonia, wants the board to respect the viewpoint of the town and that’s something he says doesn’t happen now.
“And yet the Public Service Board comes along and says, ‘Well, yeah, we can appreciate you don’t want all that. But you don’t have a right because we in the state policy say we want all renewable, all the time,’” Benning said.
He added, “‘If it’s good, it’s good. We’re going to have it whether you want it or not.’ That’s not the way that Vermont usually does business.”
Gabrielle Stebbins, head of Renewable Energy Vermont, says it’s critical to develop renewable energy sources throughout the state and this bill would hurt that effort.
“We have lived in 100 years of easy energy; easy, cheap fossil fuels,” Stebbins said. “And now we look at a very challenging new environment. ... Part of that is change and we are looking at what that means — which is, yes, you see solar panels and, yes, you see wind turbines.”
Some homeowners who live near wind, solar, and biomass projects have complained that the projects have hurt land prices in their communities. Stebbins says people need to see the bigger picture.
“We’ve got to zoom out,” she said. “It is not just about aesthetics. It is about if you want to turn on your lights. If you want to drive your car. If you want to heat your home. How are we going to do it while making this planet sustainable while having jobs and energy security?”
But Benning said local complaints are an important part of the debate.
“I’m going to ask you to zoom back in because these projects are having very real impacts on very real Vermonters,” said Benning. “These towers have an impact that unfortunately the PSB is not really taking into account.”
The full Senate is expected to consider the legislation by the end of next week and both supporters and opponents of the bill say the outcome of that vote appears to be in doubt.MORE IN Local & State
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed
- talk-pix.com PODCASTS TEMPORARILY DISABLED: Navigate browser to talk-pix.com to access complete ALMANACK archive.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: On this day 1739, 'Richard Palmer' identified in prison at York Castle as the notorious outlaw DICK TURPIN; IN 1836, Battle of the Alamo begins near San Antonio de Bexar, Texas; 1896, the Tootsie Roll invented by LEO HIRSCHFELD.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: On this day in 1472, Orkney, Shetland islands put up as collateral by Norway to Scotland in lieu of dowry for MARGARET OF DENMARK on her marriage with JAMES III, king of Scotland; 1962, JOHN GLENN first American to orbit Earth.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: City mayoral candidates debate campaign issues; Hartford, Conn., woman still missing; Neal Goswami reports attempts to legislate suicide; local woman loses 100 pounds through TOPS program.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: On this day in 1878, JOHN TUNSTALL murdered near Lincoln, New Mexico, by the outlaw JESSE EVANS; in 1930, ELM FARM OLLIE first cow to fly in aircraft, first to be milked airborne; 1955, nuke test WASP; '79, snow in Sahara.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: Rutland Herald News Editor Alan J. Keays and staff writer Gordon Dritschilo discuss stories planned for the February 18, 2015, edition of the newspaper: Winter budgets maxed, legal marijuana, Springfield bank job, USPS slowdown