“Houston, we have a problem.” The Apollo astronauts and NASA engineers saved the day because they maintained cool heads when they were very scared because they had a terrible problem. They knew they had to keep cool heads because actions taken in fear sometimes are irrational reactions.
I was able to attend Mr. McKibben’s recent presentation at the Rutland library, which was reported in the Feb. 8 Rutland Herald. Mr. McKibben has recognized we have a scary problem. He is rightfully scared about the effects of global climate change, but some of his promoted actions are irrational.
Ms. Beard writes in the Rutland Herald, “I think that, with care, consideration, solid science and engineering, it is possible to find acceptable solutions to these vital problems in our rapidly changing world.” There is much in that statement. Irrational reactions do not constitute care, consideration, solid science and engineering. We have all learned much about how very expensive industrial wind is while accomplishing very little in reducing carbon dioxide and causing significant harmful environmental and human health side-effects.
Through irrational reaction, Mr. McKibben says that every turn of a wind turbine blade is productive. He is wrong. Solid science and engineering would tell him that.
In the Rutland Herald article Mr. McKibben is quoted as saying, “I look forward to the day when I look at windmills spinning above me because it will show that we accept our responsibility.” Mr. McKibbin’s totems towers will be a symbol of our folly not of our responsibility.
Insulation is vastly more cost-effective at lowering carbon dioxide emissions than industrial wind and has no human health or environmental side-effects. If Mr. McKibben (and Sen. Sanders) need some type of symbol, then let’s put a 3-foot-by-5-foot plaque facing the street on every home that gets an insulation upgrade as part of the thermal efficiency program being discussed in the Vermont Legislature. Eighty thousand plaques all over Vermont. Now that would be a symbol to our wisdom and to our taking responsibility.
The human health and environmental effects along with the irrationality of industrial wind for electricity production are clear. We need to design a better strategy. I believe industrial wind is an irrational response to a scary problem. It is a terrible solution to a terrible problem.
JAMES N. RADEMACHER
PittsfordMORE IN Letters
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: On this day in 410 CE, Visigoths sack Rome and it isn't the first time, either; in 1859, Titusville, Pa., the first commercially viable oil well comes in; in 1918, the only World War I battle fought on U.S. soil in Nogales, Ariz.
- TODAY'S WEATHER MINUTE: Archaelogists uncover artifacts proving that late neolithic Egyptians, pre-dating the Pyramids of Giza, practiced mummification to prepare their dead for the afterlife, far earlier than presupposed.
- TODAY'S WEATHER MINUTE:Chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing that pollute ground water and the air we breathe come under scrutiny by researchers who find at least eight fracking chemicals toxic to mammals.
- TODAY'S WEATHER MINUTE: The craze for Omega-3 fatty acids as a dietary supplement in its most popular form, fish oil, has led to depletion of fish stocks in oceans throughout the world. Is this the beginning of the total collapse of global fisheries?
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: Suspects arrested in Killington bear death, Bryanna Allen and Kevin O'Connor report along the Back to School front, Rutland Plywood site remains an active fire scene as debris continues to smolder.
- TODAY'S WEATHER MINUTE: Forests around Chernobyl, even though dead from massive irradiation after nuclear accident 30 years ago, still have not even begun to decompose, natural balance disrupted at microbial level.