Do not be fooled by the pro-chloramine experts that were brought into Rutland on Tuesday. There is no scientific evidence that proves monochloramine’s safety. In fact, a lot of what was said at the mayor’s forum was silly.
Dr. Vose said that she thinks monochloramines are safe. After all, she lived for 10 years through two pregnancies with monochloramine in her water and suffered no adverse effects. That’s like saying “I smoked for X number of years and I didn’t suffer respiratory problems. Therefore cigarettes are safe.”
Some of the experts said, “People will get sick any way” so why should we worry about the few who will suffer mild to severe adverse effects? So if people get the flu and are sick should we not get our flu shots? Prevention has always been a high priority in my life.
A Vermont company offers a filtration system for $2,300 per household and an annual filter replacement for about $900. That is a far cry from the $125 per year that GAC will cost. There is no accommodation to supply home filters for people who will need them. Individual homeowners will have to bear the cost.
Again, Dr. Vose said that animal studies done in the 1970s showed no specific toxic effect. She further stated that 100 interviews based on self-diagnosis caused no concerns. Self-diagnosis was necessary because doctors don’t have the science to help them make diagnoses. Dr. Vose and others conclude that we don’t need a long-term human study even though she admits that some people will have health problems. Is it scientific to ignore the growing body of anecdotal reports that an unknown number of people will suffer adverse effects from monochloramine, and the fact that some cities are opting out of chloramine in favor of GAC?
Perhaps the silliest argument was that we don’t need to worry because there is naturally occurring ammonia in foods like cheese, peanut butter and onions. Ammonia in natural foods is ingested differently than it would be in water where it is mixed with chlorine and forms by-products that can reach dangerous levels. And I don’t know anyone who has recently taken a bath, shower or washed their clothes in cheese or onions.
While there is no scientific evidence to help us make this decision, common sense tells us that taking undesirable elements out of the water through a granular activated carbon filtration and getting “great water” is preferable to adding more chemicals that will make a certain segment of the population suffer adverse effects. It makes sense as we consider both the health and financial concerns facing this community.
Dr. ALIS HEADLAM
RutlandMORE IN Letters
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: No money this year for western rail project, Lola Aiken memorialized in Montpelier, Supreme Court Castleton murder suspect will remain in jail, Shaftbury man fires shots from his AK-47 into neighbor's home.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: On this day in 1959, Soviet Premier Nikita S. Khrushchev arrives in U.S. for historic 13-day visit; in 1987, Secretary of State George Shultz and Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze sign nuclear reduction agreement.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: City celebrates completion of its newest mural, on West Street opposite the post office, more than $2 million in federal grants will bolster Vermont's health centers, Patrick McArdle reports on pending sale of Vermont papers.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: Henry Hudson sails up the Hudson River as far as present-day Albany, Leo Szilard has epiphany waiting for the light to change, 3 kids report a West Virginia close encounter in 1952.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: Who will run for mayor in Rutland next year? Has Bennington overcome its fear of twerking? Documentary 'Hungry Heart' packs the Paramount, and the city's Creek Path scores another million-plus dollars.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: The 1509 'Lesser Judgment' earthquake on this day at Constantinople kills 13,000 and destroys the city; in 1801, on this day, Marie Laveau, the Voodoo Queen of New Orleans is born.