RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Yankee robot gets stuck while exploring underground pipe



Toolbox

By Susan Smallheer STAFF WRITER - Published: March 10, 2010

VERNON — A small robot that was exploring the underground pipe tunnel believed to be the source of the radioactive tritium leak at the Vermont Yankee nuclear reactor has fallen victim to one of the contributing factors of the leak – radioactive "mud" from deteriorating concrete and radioactive water.

The robot, which its Entergy Nuclear handlers have dubbed Rover, is about the size of a remote-controlled toy car, said Larry Smith, spokesman for Entergy Nuclear.

The robot became mired in the sludge at the bottom of the tunnel, which was also partially responsible for the leak. The sludge plugged a drain in the tunnel, which was supposed to drain off the radioactive liquid to be treated later.

Instead, in a scenario supported by both Entergy Nuclear and the Department of Health, both steam trap drain lines associated with the advanced off-gas system developed leaks, and the drain, which was designed to trap and collect any leakage, was plugged. At least one of the leaks was estimated at 100 gallons a day, the health department said.

Those steam trap drain lines carry not just tritium, but radioisotopes cobalt-60, manganese-54 and zinc-65, Smith said.

Meanwhile, the Department of Health said other pipes could be corroded, singling out pipes buried in soil under the advanced off-gas building.

Smith said "conceptual plans" already exist about replacing the pipes during Vermont Yankee's regular refueling and maintenance outage, slated to start April 24 and last until May 19.

"We will deal with piping in our upcoming outage," said Smith, who said the reactor would refuel on schedule, despite the vote by the Vermont Senate two weeks ago, declining to approve another 20 years of operation for the embattled plant.

"We will refuel and we will start up," said Smith, rejecting rumors that the 38-year-old reactor might not refuel because of the uncertainty of its future.

Since the pipe tunnel's drain was unplugged and the leaks identified, the levels of radioactive tritium have dropped substantially in what was the most contaminated well.

Smith said Rover was one of several similar remote-controlled robots Entergy Nuclear engineers are using to track down the source of the leak or leaks, which spread tritium to the banks of the Connecticut River, contaminating several underground monitoring wells.

Smith said engineers were also using a long, telescopic pole with a camera on its tip.

While the tunnel does contain radioactivity, searchers are using the robots because there isn't enough space in the tunnel for a human, and Smith noted there were 36 pipes in the tunnel.

Both of the leaks that have been identified as probable sources of the tritium and other radionuclides found in soil near the leaks are in the hydrogen recombiner steam trap drain lines. The first drain line was sealed off Feb. 14, and the other was identified Friday, a hole about the size of a dime or quarter.

So far, the tritium has not shown up in any drinking water wells either on the site or off Entergy Nuclear property, and the Connecticut River so far has tested below detectable levels for tritium, according to the Department of Health.

The well, GZ-10, which once tested positive for 2.5 million picocuries per liter, tested Monday at 1.025 million picocuries per liter, although Entergy reported late Tuesday that it had dropped to 525,000 picocuries per liter. That well is in the excavation pit.

Another well, GZ-7, which is closer to the Connecticut River, is testing now at 1.121 million picocuries per liter, and another well, GZ-15, is testing at 593,000 picocuries per liter.

In all, seven groundwater monitoring wells have tested positive for tritium, which while it occurs naturally, is also a byproduct of the nuclear fission process.

"This is more evidence that tritiated groundwater has been moving away from the source … and down toward the Connecticut River," the Department of Health stated.

susan.smallheer@rutlandherald.com







READER COMMENTS


They should have used something the size of a radio-controlled monster truck. With mud tires. Didn't they know there would be radioactive mud in that tunnel because of all the leaks over the years and the concrete dust from the crumbling old structure. I am surprised that they put any faith in using robots or cameras to find structural problems or leaks after the cooling tower fiasco. As Mr. John Dreyfuss of Entergy said " " We learned alot from this event and we have to overhaul our inspection procedures." Mr David McElwee, also of Entergy said that the use of a remote camera to inspect the structure of the cooling tower for rot and decay was, " not as good as putting your hands on the member."
But now both of these men are on administrative leave. So is there noone there with enough institutional knowledge to prevent repeating their past mistakes?
-- Posted by John Ward on Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 11:22 am EST

report this comment



This would make the beginnings of a GREAT episode of "The Simpsons".
-- Posted by Son Of That Guy on Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 11:18 am EST

report this comment



DANGER!!!

DANGER, WILL ROBINSON!!!!!!!
-- Posted by Dave None on Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 10:41 am EST

report this comment



Every time we read yet another story about this aged, leaking plant, there is a line that reminds us that tritium occurs naturally, but it's also a biproduct of the fission process.

That's true, but misleading. Tritium in our natural environment is in incredibly small amounts. It would be like saying that the forest fire that dessimated 100,000 acres of forested land is the same fire that you use in your gas stove to make tea. Yeah, it's the same fire with much different results.

Let's no fool ourselves. When you have a plant that is 38 years old (the longest any plant has ever run worldwide is 47 years) and uprated 20% beyond its designed capacity (no plant has run beyond its original license uprated at 20%) you are going to see more and more failures occur. It's only logical.

If IBM is truly concerned about reliable energy going forward, they should be concerned about the prospects of failure after failure happening at VY....because they are going to continue to happen if it is allowed to operate longer than any other plant in history.
-- Posted by Robert Stannard on Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 7:21 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout