RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Trustee criticizes shelter plan



Toolbox

By Susan Smallheer STAFF WRITER - Published: December 11, 2009

BELLOWS FALLS – A plan to open a "warming shelter" in downtown Bellows Falls was condemned by a village trustee, who said the new shelter would draw more homeless people to the village.

The Rockingham Planning Commission held a public hearing Wednesday night on the plans by area social service agencies and churches to open a 15-bed Greater Falls Warming Shelter at 24 Canal St.

The shelter would open every evening at 7 p.m., and close every morning at 7 a.m. If approved, the shelter hopes to open as soon as possible, and close around mid-April.

Bellows Falls Village Trustee Stefan Golec spoke strongly against the shelter, questioning the wisdom of placing it in the downtown business district and whether there was a need for such a large shelter.

"Once you build it, they will come," said Golec, who said he was representing the entire Board of Trustees.

Golec said the current system of handling homeless people through the town service officer was more efficient.

Bianca Fernandez, who works for Youth Services, is chairwoman of the building committee, said people were in danger of freezing outside, especially now since the mild fall has finally turned into winter weather.

Fernandez said three families were facing eviction notices and had no place to go, and six youngsters in the area were living in what she called "extremely unsafe situations."

She said she knew of five people living outside in tents.

Southeastern Vermont Community Action has agreed to be the fiscal agent for the new organization, and there will be one staffer for the shelter, someone to coordinate volunteers. The staffer would open and close the shelter every morning and evening, she said, and there would be two trained volunteers at the shelter at all times.

Board members asked Fernandez about the need for the facility, and questioned whether people would come to the Bellows Falls shelter from other towns.

"Do you anticipate an influx of people?" asked Alan Fowler, who owns a downtown business, Village Booksellers.

Chairman Robert DeRusha said the hearing would strictly follow the criteria that the planning commission would consider – impact on municipal services such as parking, police and fire, or lighting or energy use. There were no comments filed by either the Bellows Falls fire or police departments.

But Golec said the shelter would place "an undue burden on services," provided by the village, "particularly police."

"The character of the area will be unfairly affected," he said.

Golec said he also questioned its adequacy to solve the homeless problem in the area, since it would close every day at 7 a.m. – putting people back out on the street.

"It won't be 24 hours … where will they be?" he said, adding that they would probably loiter in area businesses on the days that Our Place, the local drop-in center is not open.

The Rockingham Select Board, which has had its differences with the Village Trustees on a variety of issues, recently earmarked $10,000 toward the creation of the new shelter at the request of Select Board member Ann DiBernardo, who is also the town's service officer.

DeRusha asked Golec for hard information about the impact on police services.

Fernandez had said in Brattleboro, which operates a similar shelter, it had minimal impact on police services and those were only medical emergencies.

"There were no incidences or violence or crime," she said.

Fernandez also said previously that Bellows Falls Village Police Chief Ron Lake had worked closely with the social service agencies while they investigated opening such a shelter.

The planning board adjourned behind closed doors and later announced it had formally closed the hearing.

Ellen Howard, the town's zoning officer, said Thursday she expected a decision to be made public before the required 45 days.

susan.smallheer@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Geta Grip, you oughta Geta Dose of reality yourself sometime. Meanwhile, why don't you open your doors to all these tired, poor, huddled masses and show them your responsibility, compassion, humanity, brilliance, and holiday spirit! Oh, that's right...you don't want your residence or your money placed at risk. Better that others' businesses and assets be subjected to that...Just what I thought...
-- Posted by Fire for Effect on Sat, Dec 12, 2009, 12:11 am EST

report this comment



The merchants and building owners in BF have made a huge investment in trying to revitalize their village. An investment the entire WORKING community and their children benefit from WRT job opportunity, building restoration, clean streets, safety, dining/entertainment, and shopping convenience.

And I can find this where ?? Your living in a fantasy world
-- Posted by Matthew Smith on Fri, Dec 11, 2009, 9:32 pm EST

report this comment



Please, everyone, calm down. There are people living in tents around the edges of the village, who are as likely to hang out downtown as if they were sleeping in a shelter there. There are even some homeless who prefer to sleep in tents - more privacy, more their own schedule, and with a good winter tent and sleeping bag, more comfort.

Having the shelter in that location will not be without impact. After this year, those planning it have promised it will be moved to a better location, not right off the town square like this. We should hold them to it. Those organizing it have refused to limit its use to those who have ties to Rockingham. This is strange, especially when it sounds like there are enough people already here, who do have ties, to fill the beds. If they'd limit admission to those already here anyway, that would remove the concern about it attracting homeless people off the Interstate corridor.

If it does attract people off the road, mental health advocates tell us to expect about 1 in 3 to be schizophrenic or manic-depressive. We need to have funded services available then to help such people, and to be sure that they don't loiter in the square and scare others away from the stores and offices there. It should be expected that some might turn out a danger to themselves or others. This is sad, but the reality of the homeless population. Maybe we'll be lucky, but we need more than luck, we need thorough planning for the contingencies.

On the one side we have shelter advocates who don't want to admit that there is real danger from having a shelter; on the other those who see nothing but danger, and can't see the need to provide compassion and hope. Only if the advocates admit to the dangers and draft thorough plans to deal with them might those now solely focused on those dangers ease their concerns. We need to find that middle ground.
-- Posted by Whit Blauvelt on Fri, Dec 11, 2009, 10:28 am EST

report this comment



Major Taxpayer.....who are you to call these people parasites? Perhaps they see people like you as the same. These are people, who in this economy have clearly struggled for whatever reason and you want to, what?, pretend that they don't exist. Maybe you and Mr. Golec should have lunch together sometime, you can call it a meeting of the "good ole boys club". Get your head out of the sand! The problem exist in the community already the only thing that would be different is that these people would have a warm place to sleep at night. Ignorance abounds when is should be responsibility and compassion! Maybe you should spend a night outside in a tent and experience what these people do every night and then see if you wouldn't want a shelter. Disgusting! Inhumane! Ignorant! Oh and Happy Holidays I'm sure you will be warm on Christmas day!
-- Posted by Geta Grip on Fri, Dec 11, 2009, 9:22 am EST

report this comment



The merchants and building owners in BF have made a huge investment in trying to revitalize their village. An investment the entire WORKING community and their children benefit from WRT job opportunity, building restoration, clean streets, safety, dining/entertainment, and shopping convenience.

I'll grant you their are more prosperous communities, but there is no surer way to destroy the village then infest it with parasites.

Tell me Mr. Smith, what have you sacrificed for the benefit of those that make BF home?
-- Posted by Major Taxpayer on Fri, Dec 11, 2009, 9:08 am EST

report this comment



Here goes Stefan again with his "Not in my back yard Scream" seems to me he has done nothing to solve any of the villages problems only create more...Your worried about the businees down street ??? What business????
-- Posted by Matthew Smith on Fri, Dec 11, 2009, 5:25 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout