RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Defendant denies kicking dying man



Toolbox

By Josh O'Gorman Herald Staff - Published: January 28, 2009

WHITE RIVER JUNCTION — A Springfield man denied charges Tuesday he kicked a man who lay dying from multiple gunshot wounds.

Timothy J. Arbuckle, 28, pleaded innocent in White River Junction District Court to a single misdemeanor charge of simple assault, which carries a maximum penalty of one year in prison and a $1,000 fine.

The charges stems from an incident Aug. 17 at MacKenzie Field in Chester, in which Vincent R. Tamburello Jr., 31, of Springfield, was shot dead. The man implicated in the shooting, Kyle D. Bolaski, 25, of Chester, was originally charged with second-degree murder and aggravated assault with a weapon. The medical examiner's report showed Tamburello died from a gunshot wound to the back.

In November, the murder charge against Bolaski was dropped after a grand jury declined to return a charge of either murder or manslaughter. Multiple witnesses told police Tamburello had been chasing Bolaski with a splitting maul, court records state.

In the original affidavit filed in August, a witness told police she saw Arbuckle kick Tamburello as he lay on the ground after being shot, but Windsor County State's Attorney Robert Sand waited until January to file charges.

"As someone who was allegedly there, Mr. Arbuckle may have had useful information about the case," Sand said.

The original account of Arbuckle allegedly kicking Tamburello was corroborated during the grand jury proceeding. Records of grand jury proceedings are usually not available to the public unless they become part of the court record, and Tuesday, 27 pages of transcription of the grand jury proceeding were released.

Keith Destromp Jr., of Springfield, told Sand he saw Arbuckle kick Tamburello, but did not actually see Arbuckle's foot make contact with Tamburello.

According to Destromp's testimony, he was torn between helping Tamburello and fleeing the park with his 7-year-old son, and as he left the park he looked at Tamburello and "it was like somebody look(ing) up at you like, help me, that's what I saw, help, help, help me," Destromp said.

Tuesday's arraignment was the first court proceeding related to Tamburello's death attended by the victim's family, which resides in Methuen, Mass. Tamburello's parents, Vincent Sr. and Ronnie Tamburello, have complained of not being notified in time to get to court, but Tuesday they were upset neither Sand nor Victims' Advocate Pamela Weigel were in court.

"This is the first time we've been told about a court date so we could come here," Ronnie Tamburello said. "I assumed the victims' advocate would be here."

"He (Sand) could have taken some time to talk to us," Vincent Tamburello Sr. said, "but they didn't come, they didn't show up, nothing."

Sand said he was not in court Tuesday because his office handles arraignments on a rotating basis among himself and his deputies. Weigel was not present because his office didn't know the Tamburellos would be at Arbuckle's arraignment, Sand said.

Contact Josh O'Gorman at josh.ogorman@rutlandherald.com.








READER COMMENTS


This guy is despicable!! kicks a dying man on the ground and helpless then beats on a girl!! He is nothing but a freaking coward!! He deserves jail time. If his girlfriend reads this please do not ever go back to him. you will regret it the rest of your life. Put him in jail like he deserves. And if you have any information concerning the murder case please come forward before he does it to the next girl!!
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Feb 5, 2009, 10:31 am EST

report this comment



I honestly beleive Arbuckle was due in court on 2-2-09 for Assault and Battery on his HOPEFULLY EX-girl friend. No man should ever put his hands on a woman. I'm glad she pressed charges on him as he thinks he can get away with any thing, in which he seems to think he'll get away with what he done to Little Vinny. I don't know his girl friend but please don't let any man put their hands on you, like I said you deserve someone who will love you with their heart not their hands.

Please listen to a concerned parent.

















i
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Feb 4, 2009, 9:04 pm EST

report this comment



Hmmmm. How soon after this murder did Arbuckle get arrested for displaying this cromagnon masochism on his girlfriend? My thoughts are this fight between them two was over the events that took place at McKenzie Park. I'm willing to bet his girlfriend said if the cromagnon didn't tell the truth, then she was going to. I'm also willing to bet he enjoyed beating her. Uh, and if you read this Arbuckle let me explain what I mean by cromagnon masochism. I'm referring to prehistoric behavior our ancestors found pleasing that ended before the last ice age(roughly about 8500 B.C.). In other words this behavior(and your behavior to that kid at McKenzie Park) will not be tolerated. This is the new millenium. Get with it, OR GET OUT!!!
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Wed, Feb 4, 2009, 1:25 pm EST

report this comment



I know that after Vinny was MURDERED, Tim Arbuckle wa arrested for beating up his girl friend, in which he was arrested and did go to jail. Whoever his girl friend is, please don't let him get away with doing this to you, because it he does, he'll do it again, and if your relation ship with him is to continue and you end up getting married, you'll end up seeking help for Domestic Violence. No man should ever put his hands on a Woman. You definately deserve a good man who will love you.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Feb 3, 2009, 8:52 pm EST

report this comment



You know, I keep going over this last passage in the above article...Tuesday's arraignment was the first court proceeding related to Tamburello's death attended by the victim's family, which resides in Methuen, Mass. Tamburello's parents, Vincent Sr. and Ronnie Tamburello, have complained of not being notified in time to get to court, but Tuesday they were upset neither Sand nor Victims' Advocate Pamela Weigel were in court.

"This is the first time we've been told about a court date so we could come here," Ronnie Tamburello said. "I assumed the victims' advocate would be here."

"He (Sand) could have taken some time to talk to us," Vincent Tamburello Sr. said, "but they didn't come, they didn't show up, nothing."

Sand said he was not in court Tuesday because his office handles arraignments on a rotating basis among himself and his deputies. Weigel was not present because his office didn't know the Tamburellos would be at Arbuckle's arraignment, Sand said...Why did Sands let someone else handle a high-profil case like this? It doesn't make sense unless he deliberately dodged the Tamburello family. I wonder why! I also wonder why he kept the date away from the Tamburellos. Something isn't right here. The DA is supposed to keep the family informed, isn't he/she?
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Mon, Feb 2, 2009, 7:38 pm EST

report this comment



I feel dirty just from reading all of this.
-- Posted by Comfy Anon on Mon, Feb 2, 2009, 8:55 am EST

report this comment



Justice for the grieving family of Little Vinny Tamburello is all that's wanted. Little Vinny was taken by thugs on 8/17/2008. Life cut short. Vinny had plans of getting married this year and to start a new life with his wife. PRETTY SAD! Little Vinny parent's were so happy for him and now they will never have a marriage to attend let alone never have any grandchildren from Little Vinny. Nothing will ever be the same for them.

Heart Broken
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 10:08 pm EST

report this comment



To Vincents cousin your whole post is exactly what a have heard about the story now, as hearing things just living in Springfield and being in that age group. I totally agree with you as i have said in past posts that he only went after one thing in the end and that was the truck and i do beleive he showed up to stand out for himself as being new in town thinking probably facing fist fight not gun battle. Just the fact that this is the first case Sands has ever decided to sent to a grand jury is a little questionable in my mind, with all the witnesses and evidence i think he could have at least gotten a conviction for voluntary murder. There must of been more cases with less facts that he took a chance on a conviction with no grand jury so why this one??? I commend the Tamburellos for coming to this site and sticking up for a man they loved and feel like most of us Vermonters did not derserve to be brually kiilled in front of hundreds of people, with only a few standing up and talking to th eright people about what they saw. Hope at the least you guys go after them in a civil court and make them pay justice and take responsibility one way or another. MY prayers go out to you and this in no way should be the way vermont and springfield should be portrayed. I personally didnt know Vincent but no one deserved this.
-- Posted by Maureen Gould on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 8:18 pm EST

report this comment



My son Kirk grew up with Little Vinny, we were next door neighbors for many many years. Kirk and Vinny started pre-school together and if Vinny was not there when I took Kirk to school, he cried and didn't want to go to school w/o Vinny. It was the other way around same with Vinny. They were very good friends and as they grew older they would go to the basketball field and shoot hoop, Vinny was awesome in basketball, Kirk was fast but shot, but still enjoyed the sport. There would be alot of sleep overs and many good times. Vinny was a good kid that grew up to be a gentleman, he would do anything to help anyone, if they needed a shirt Vinny would take his off and give it.
Vinny was raised by good hard working parents and his mother worked mother's hours so she would be home when her children got out of school. Vinny was the oldest of his 3 other siblings. In all the years I've known the Tamburello Family never once did I ever see or hear that any of their children were involved in a fight. I was always out my kitchen window watching the kids go by or calling one of mine. I was in Florida at the time Vinny was murdered with my son Kirk who lives there and Kirk cried his eyes out as did I. Vinny will be missed so much by all, but most of all Vinny died knowing his whole family LOVED HIM and so did his true friends.

Kirk and Mom
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 8:03 pm EST

report this comment



I agree if anyone knows something and wants to talk about it e-mail Paul Barnicle, also their should be another story coming out in the Boston Globe on Monday, you can go online and read it. At this time The Tamburello family is going through very hard times with losing their oldest son, no one knows their pain unles you have lost a loved one to murder, then you understand what it feels like.

Medical Examiner's Report done! Yes stated it was Homicide!

Coroner's Report done! YES

Statements done by all that were at field! YES Then changes.

You are assigned a District Attorney that communicates with the family. Not usually the murder! Did the Tamburello's get this NO. They were told by Mr. Sand he does not represent the Tamburello's, Vinny, the people of Vermont, only the County. SAD

You are assigned a Victim Advocate! YES that only does e-mails to them without ample notice, thats why the Tamburello's have missed court dates! SAD

You have a Homicide Detective assigned to the case! Yes, but DA is not on the same page because none of this was done:

Measurements and Distances were not done! NO So it's hear say or guessing??????

Gun Residude was not done!

Toxicology report only done on victim! WHY

Investigation into the case. VERY LITTLE IF ANY.

How come they waited 6 hours to do an Alcohol test on Kyle??? Did they want it to come back that he was sober, when he still failed it?????

There is so much to do in a Homicide case and before you do anything you need to make sure you have more than enough evidence to proceed forward with the case. WAS THIS DONE????

The Tamburello family was told they needed to get their own Attorney. PRETTY SAD!!! But they have hired Paul Barnicle.

Please help to get these thugs off the streets of Vermont. VERMONT WILL BE A SAFER PLACE.

ANGEL GIRL
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 7:43 pm EST

report this comment



First of all none none I would like to extend my heartfelt sympathy to the Tamburello's. It now makes a lot of sense as to why he went down to the field in the first place. I can't imagine what his parents are going through. As a parent of 2 boys myself I know I would be devastated if any of my sons were killed, especially in the manner as Vinnie was. Which makes it worse is that not only do they have to grieve for their son but they have to fight to get him justice. I agree something really stinks as to how the Grand Jury was held. I mean anyone can get an indictment. As my police friends say in all their years they have never seen a jury not come back with an indictment. Unless the jury was misled and crucial evidence was not presented. It seems that is what has happened here. And there is only one reason why Sand would jeopardize his career for these lowlife scum of the earth drug dealers and murderers and that is they turned states evidence to become informants. As a Vermont resident for over 20 years I have never seen a case like this. If there was anything I or my children could do to help we would be there! I feel ashamed that the Tamburello's have to go through all of this just to get justice for their son. I hope and pray that people will come forward to tell what they know. Vinnie made a mistake like you said but he paid for it with his life. There is no doubt he was set up and lured to the field. I hope the Tamburello's do find peace one day and I hope they realize that not all people from Vermont are as bad as those drug dealers. We are good law abiding people that do not hate people that come from out of state, rather we look forward to anyone that wants to come and live in this great state. But with all the attention this is getting I know there are going to be a lot less visitors. And we can thank Sand for that. If there is anyone out there that can help this case I implore you to come forward for you will be the heroes not those dirtbags. Please show the world what Vermont is made of. Look deep in your heart and do the right thing. Show the world what we are made of.
-- Posted by VT Dad None on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 6:06 pm EST

report this comment



First of all none none I would like to extend my heartfelt sympathy to the Tamburello's. It now makes a lot of sense as to why he went down to the field in the first place. I can't imagine what his parents are going through. As a parent of 2 boys myself I know I would be devastated if any of my sons were killed, especially in the manner as Vinnie was. Which makes it worse is that not only do they have to grieve for their son but they have to fight to get him justice. I agree something really stinks as to how the Grand Jury was held. I mean anyone can get an indictment. As my police friends say in all their years they have never seen a jury not come back with an indictment. Unless the jury was misled and crucial evidence was not presented. It seems that is what has happened here. And there is only one reason why Sand would jeopardize his career for these lowlife scum of the earth drug dealers and murderers and that is they turned states evidence to become informants. As a Vermont resident for over 20 years I have never seen a case like this. If there was anything I or my children could do to help we would be there! I feel ashamed that the Tamburello's have to go through all of this just to get justice for their son. I hope and pray that people will come forward to tell what they know. Vinnie made a mistake like you said but he paid for it with his life. There is no doubt he was set up and lured to the field. I hope the Tamburello's do find peace one day and I hope they realize that not all people from Vermont are as bad as those drug dealers. We are good law abiding people that do not hate people that come from out of state, rather we look forward to anyone that wants to come and live in this great state. But with all the attention this is getting I know there are going to be a lot less visitors. And we can thank Sand for that. If there is anyone out there that can help this case I implore you to come forward for you will be the heroes not those dirtbags. Please show the world what Vermont is made of. Look deep in your heart and do the right thing. Show the world what we are made of.
-- Posted by VT Dad None on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 6:00 pm EST

report this comment



Rest easy None. Sands isn't too popular with a lot of Springfielders. I understand what you say about ending it and I'm sorry he couldn't have come up with another way. These kids have a lot of Springfielders fighting amongst each other about this incident. The people I've talked to feel the same about Sands. Something happened at that Grand Jury. No one I've talked tosaid they would have let Bolaski go so I don't know. I do know someone has to take a hard stance on drugs or a lot of Vermonters will end up like Richard and leave this state.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 5:29 pm EST

report this comment



Hello everyone. This is my first time on a blog but there is something I would like to clear up. Vinnie is my cousin and there is a lot of questions as to why he was there. My aunt and uncle will probably be mad at me for saying this but I feel it has to be said. After the initial argument when Vinnie got the call from Ucci and told him to come to the field he thought it would be a one on one. His Fiance Julie begged him not to go but Vinnie told her that if he didn't go then they would always antagonize them, always cause trouble. They would not have peace to start their new life in Vermont. He had to go to confront them to end it so they could have the life they wanted together without always running or being scared. When they pulled into the park They were surprised to see how many people were there waiting for him. Julie begged him to leave but Vinnie said no, that it had to end here one way or the other. when they started going up to their car Vinnie got out of the car, told Julie to call 911 and to leave. But she would not leave. They showed the taser to try to scare them off but they kept advancing that is when Vinnie grabbed the awl and chased them and, well, you know the rest. Vinnie was the type that didn't start trouble but would not back down from it either. He would not have hurt anyone, like the one person he did grab but let go. He wanted to scare them so they would leave them alone. He never thought that they would be cowardly enough to bring guns. He would have fought all 10 or 12 of them if he had to. Unfortunately Vinnie's judgement let him down that day. He was slaughtered for denting a truck. Not any person but a truck. I'm not saying Vinnie was correct in doing what he did but he made a mistake and paid the ultimate price. Now it is time for people to come forward and do the right thing. Show the world what Vermont is made of. Not cowardly scumbag drug dealers, but good, honest law abiding citizens willing to stand up for what is right. Sands seems to think these murderers/drug dealers are more important than you are. Something stinks as to how this was presented to the Grand Jury. They obviously agreed to become informants. Sands obviously believes that is more important than your sons or daughters safety. Please, I beg of you, show him he is wrong. If you know anything that can help, come forward or e-mail Paul Barnicle at pbarnicle@bmnlaw.net. It will be completely confidential. The next time may be one of your children! Stop them now. Thank you from all of us and may God guide you to do the right thing.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 3:14 pm EST

report this comment



Oops. Deb please don't think I meant Vincent. I meant the Bolaskis and company. I would have made sure Vincent got the help he needed. Not all Vermonters are like them and don't feel like you can't come up here and enjoy what Vermont has to offer. It's people like Bolaski and company Vermont can do without.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 2:33 pm EST

report this comment



Sorry to all of you who think I could have any influence on the people that were witnesses, as I believe they have all already provided sworn written statements, and I have since moved out of state to pursue my career. However, based on their accounts, they believed that the first shot was justified and defensive, especially because Bolaski did not have the gun already loaded, but rather loaded it quickly before the shot. They also all believe that the second shot was murder, and that the beating of the dying man that ensued was cold-blooded. Just wanted to shed a little light on my situation and the accounts of the witnesses I talked to.
-- Posted by Richard Putnam on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 2:28 pm EST

report this comment



Hi Deb. I'm going to assume your post is directed at me since I'm the one who brought money and drugs into this. First, though, I want to extend my condolences to your family. If your from Boston then I assume your related to the Tamburellos. I can't begin to tell you all the good things my daughter has to say about Vincent. She's cried almost every time this topic comes up. She also never talked good about Kyle or Tim. Ucci is no better. I'd like to continue with if I was on that field and saw the event take place, I would be the one on trial here because I would have shot them all. My daughter used to go down there frequently and I can assure you if these idiots put my daughters life in jeopardy I would have taken him out. Now, you're right about Sands thats why I say something stinks about this. And for Whitey Bulger, well, we know him up here too. As for Richard. If you scroll down about a third of the way you will see a post with that name.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 2:09 pm EST

report this comment



I am curious as to when this turned into money and drugs?From the knowledge I have on Sands he was not suppose to ever take a case on drugs again because of his stunt with the lawyer he gave a slap on the wrist and put her on community service and all cases that involved drugs were suppose to be taken out of Sands hands per order of your Govenor.

So as a family member you can't help but wonder how the Govenor let that slip his mind and changed the rules.

Being from Boston we all seen this happen with Whitney Bulger, he was an informant and was allowed to kill and was above the law as well....

Who is this Richard you speak of, is it the one that really is typing in here?
-- Posted by Deb Auch on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 1:05 pm EST

report this comment



Sorry people. Wireless bites it. I'm not surprised how much has gone on since I've last had connection. I'm also not surprised there were so many people down on that field that day and no one came forward. I couldn't agree more with Luke about Richard. While Richard has a number of friends who have yet to come forward and do the right thing, I'd like to thank Keith Destromp for his courage. I don't know if I could live with that scene playing out in my head over and over again. While we have our problems up here, no one I know would have let Bolaski get away with this. Shame on Sands. Thank God I don't have to look in the mirror and see the person that let Bolaski get away with murder.
-- Posted by My two cents on Sun, Feb 1, 2009, 12:26 pm EST

report this comment



Well said Arnie. Why did he have to pull that trigger if the man was runnung away. I just can't believe Sands could be so ignorant to the obvious. Something stinks about this. We know drugs were involved. We know that the kid showed up with his girlfriend so in essence he was alone. We know he was shot in the back and we know he was rifle butted and then kicked. What we don't know is why did the second rifle come out of the house? Although I think it was obvious because somewhere in this statement:

Smith said that during the interview, which was tape recorded, Blanchard claimed that when they arrived at the ball field and noticed there were quite a few people there, including families, because a ball game had just ended, that he, "told Cory he didn't like what was happening."
Even though they knew there were families on that ballfield they still chose to pull out those rifles. They did because they intended on killing him. They just didn't know there were so many people there. Bolaski used Tamburellos rage to his advantage and finished what he went there to do anyway and cried self defense. What a lowlife. I can't understand why this made it by the Grand Jury unless Sands deliberately withheld information. I'd be curious to see how he presented the case to the Jury. Why hasn't the State taken this over? How obvious can this murder be? I say get Sands of this case, bring in Richard Putnams buddies and put this killer away for life.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 11:40 pm EST

report this comment



My thoughts exactly, Maureen. The intent to kill was there. They didn't bring those guns to protect themselves because if they feared for their life then why show up at all. And VTDad I thought you knew a little to much about this until I saw you were from Springfield. I know you're hearing what I'm hearing. Did you also hear that it was drugs Tamburello took from Blanchards house and not money? I'm hearing Tamburellos family is rich, his brothers on tv all the time, so I don't think it was money either. It's got to be dope doesn't it? Senseless to be killed over a bag of dope. We know Sands' stance on dope so that won't matter. But what does is these people are selling their crap to our kids. I hear some people say that Bolaski is a hero for pulling that trigger because we don't need outsiders starting trouble around here. But that's not the way I see it. I see someone who killed somebody over a bag of dope. And that's a bigger threat to my kids than Tamburello could ever be. Richard, you can be the hero here and get those people to tell what they know and put these kids in jail.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 8:43 pm EST

report this comment



read the stories over and over again. One thing really bothers me. The way tamburello has been portrayed has been as a maniac that was going to chop everybody up. But in the statements I read Arbuckle threatened Tamburello that they were going to kick his a$$. When Tamburello did not go down they all went up to him. If Arbucle made that first threat and Tamburello did not go down, to me that shows that T amburello did not really want this confrontation. But the men that approached him with his fiance gave him little choice but to get out to protect his girl. Another piece I read Ucci says Tamburello grabbed one of the people and said "I could kill you right now, but let him go! That doesn't sound to me like a maniac on a killing spree. Then he did not go after anyone. By all accounts Tamburello only went to the truck and hit it. Kyle was on the other side of the truck waiting for his brother to open it for him. Yet Tamburello Did not go after him. Kyle then loads the gun, which that in itself shows intent, and runs to where Tamburello was and then the shooting began. He shot him once, chased him shot him in the back as Tamburello was trying to flee and then brutally beat him an a rage as he lay dying. then Arbuckle was kicking him. It seems to me that there was no self defense there. Kyle in a drunken rage because Tamburello beat his truck made up his mind that Tamburello was going to die. That is how I see it. I am not sticking up for anyone just stating the facts as they have come out. And the facts show that these guys, who did not even Know Tamburello therefore should have minded their own business. Tamburello is dead. he can never bother anyone again. So why is Sand protecting these animals even now? They have to get them off the streets! These men are a worse menace than Tamburelo ever was. Come on people you all know these guys they are no good drug dealers who push their poison on our kids. I have heard of the beatings they got for not paying. When is it that they kill our sons or daughters? Sooner than you think! This dirt has to get off our streets and if Sand is too cowardly to do it then get him out of there and bring in someone that will do the job right. Do not sacrifice our son's and daughters for these scums of the earth. I myself am going to write to Sand and have him to not give these guyr any deals. I urge everybody else to the same2 or SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES!! There's no doubt HE IS AN INFORMANT for the state. I hope his dealers take them out rather than our hard earned tax dollars being used to protect those scum bags.
-- Posted by VT Dad None on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 7:35 pm EST

report this comment



I doubt the above article is as good as witnesses and investigation results.

Just some quick observations that don't make a lot of sense.

1. "Multiple witnesses told police Tamburello had been chasing Bolaski with a splitting maul, court records state."
but... "The medical examiner's report showed Tamburello died from a gunshot wound to the back."

Running backwards maybe?

Now I would also ask, anyone who is being chased by a man, running backwards at you with a splitting maul and you fear for your life and shoot the man in the back. Would you in you fearful state, go up and start kicking him?

2. If he was indeed chasing and then he saw you had a gun and turned and fled, why would you have to pull the trigger?
-- Posted by Arnie Thibault on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 6:29 pm EST

report this comment



the people making statements about Vinnie knowing Bolanski unless you all know something his family doesn't your statements are inaccurate.Bolanski wasn't there the night before so why did Bolanksi get involved? The statements about the rifles being trasnferred to another truck is true so there for it was premeditated.Key people involved made these statements.

Now let me understand these comments four guys approached the car, yet Bolanksi was at his truck and he was running down the hill too? Bolanski must be super human and split himself into three or do these statements change when they are convient to protect a malicious murderer? Why would Vinnie choose Bolanki's truck if he had nothing to do with approaching his vehicle? Vinnie did not go to meet up with Bolanski, it was not Bolanksi on the phone as you all are aware.

If you Vermont people think real hard about this I would change my statement as well if i witnessed Bolanksi murder someone and bash his face in with a rifle and be set free.What other choice did they have or be next in line for what Vinnie received. What happens when Bolanski gets angry at one of your own or you yourself? Will you Vermonters be the in line burying one of your own as Bolanski is saying see it was self defense!!

Not one of you are safe Bolanksi is above the law and you have to wonder why?
-- Posted by Deb Auch on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 6:02 pm EST

report this comment



I just like T bone thought that the gun was probably in the truck like every other vermonter does and should have a right to but changed my mind about the whole situation once the statement by Bolaskis own friend that they switched the gun into other truck then retreived other gun. At that point the had already spoken to Vincent guy, who i never knew,so why else would they have been switched to other truck? And if I was one lone guy with 4 others confronting me i may grab a weapon to have them back off too. No doubt he was also out for trouble with an axe (or was it in the vehicle for maybe choppong wood for work maybe?) but seems like he already is serving his punishment, for life.
-- Posted by Maureen Gould on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 5:25 pm EST

report this comment



I started thinking after I posted this, and my little girl will probably resent me for saying this but I sound like I'm defending a person Vermont is better off without. I'm not. But I'm not going to defend these other fools either because we will be better off without them and anyone like them. If I had the knowledge, these kids would not be walking the streets. I would be proud to look at my kids and say I did the right thing because I did it for them. I did it because I'm tired of people like the Tasmburellos, the Bolaskis, Uccis and Blanchards.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 3:44 pm EST

report this comment



Interesting post TBone. Personally I believe if Ucci never made that call then we'd have another worry to walk our streets. But that's what I want to focus on. I know I've flown off the handle and "said" I'll f-n kill you you S-O-B but always found myself cracking a beer and setting traps with that same guy hours later. We all say things in "the heat of the moment." Civilized people don't call someone on those words and then set up to meet them. We have one threat off our streets, but that's not enough. There are four more that shouldn't be walking our streets. This particular piece of the article clearly shows intent...

Police said that Blanchard told them that he and the Bolaskis were all in Cory Bolaski's truck along with their friend Jerry Ucci, 21, late Sunday afternoon while, "Kyle and Jerry were drinking Budweiser," which was when Ucci decided to call Tamburello on his cell phone.

"Blanchard advised he couldn't hear what Vinny was saying but could tell that the conversation was heated and that Jerry made arrangements with Vinny to meet at the baseball field. Blanchard then advised that Jerry contacted Timothy Arbuckle who was at (McKenzie Field) and told him they were on their way and that Vinny was going to meet them there," Vermont State Police Detective Sgt. Walter Smith wrote in his affidavit.

Next, according to Blanchard, the quartet decided that because the fuel was low in Cory Bolaski's truck they would drive back to his residence and switch to Kyle's pickup for the trip to McKenzie Field. "Kyle transferred the (30-06) rifle from Cory's truck into his," police quoted Blanchard as explaining. "Blanchard advised that that Cory went into the house and came out with a second rifle and placed it inside Kyle's truck as well (then) they all proceeded to (McKenzie) field."

"I asked Blanchard if, while arrangements were being made to meet Vinny at the ball field and seeing alcohol and firearms being brought into the situation, if any one of them thought to use his cell phone to call the police and he advised they did not," Detective Sgt. Smith noted.

If that phone call was never made then we would have never known the five threats that brush elbows with our kids. So, on behalf of my kids, I'm glad to know the faces of these guys. But I'm also going to say, if that phone call was never made, these kids would never have ended up like this. And to shed some truth to a previous poster, Tamburello wasn't 300 pounds but my daughter said he was "built." She said he was always quiet. She knows him, she Bolaskis, Ucci, and Blachard. She also knows Tamburellos girlfriend. From what's being tossed around here, the fight previous fight stemmed from one of them grabbing Tamburellos girlfriends mother by the head and dragging her out of the house. What's also being said is Blanchard said Tamburello went to his house, threatened everyone in there and stole some money. But my daughter said it wasn't money, it was drugs. I looked at Cory Bolaskis facebook page and saw him with his sister smoking dope. Not that I didn't believe her. I just had to see what he looked like. And Richard, you know what goes on down at that field if you're there all the time. You can help clean up that place by talking to these people that were there and tell them what "really" happened. If these people don't, then what next? Will we be burying some of our own? Do you want that on your head. I know I don't and I certainly don't want to bury one of mine.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 3:08 pm EST

report this comment



Hello all, sorry I'm late. I was out coyote hunting with my M-16.
Now then, I would like to say thanks to Cool Hand Luke for the link to that other article. so thank you. It was the same article i had read before. And the other one that you posted was an interesting read also. As far as the posted one is concerned, i will only comment that I am with Fullerton on that and wait for the rest of the statements.
OK,here we go. Sounds like, to me, that allot of you know one or more of these people that are involved. I myself do not recognize any of the names, nor do i believe i have even met any of them. And i also was not at the park.
As for Art.16. It is I, ME,T BONE, who hates cops! Please stop stealing my thunder.(lol)
Now for you good people of Vermont (not you flat-lander wannabes). In my previous posts, everything I said, is and was, based on the first shot being justified. However, now it appears that perhaps there was some premeditation. If and i say 'IF' the guns were indeed placed in the truck with intent on injuring another human-being, than that in it self is a crime under VT law. And it seems that the taser and the ax were also placed in the car with intent. ( and not surprisingly, had something to do with a young lady).
So now I'm left with Bolaski and Tamburello both showing up with intent to each other. (two wrongs making a wronger) Now, this is a crop from the previous article:
According to statements that Jenkins took from Bolaski, his brother and Bolaski's friend, Jerry Ucci, there had been an incident Saturday involving Tamburello that precipitated the confrontation on Sunday. Springfield police were involved in the Saturday incident, but no arrests were made and no report was available on Monday, according to Springfield Police.
Ucci told police the dispute revolved around Tamburello's girlfriend, who was briefly involved with a friend of his and Bolaski's last year.
Ucci told police that Tamburello promised revenge on everyone involved in the incident on Saturday, including Tristan Blanchard, who came with Bolaski to the park on Sunday. Ucci told police that he relayed a message to Tamburello telling him to come to the ball field.
When Tamburello arrived, Bolaski and his friends allegedly tried to approach the car he came in, but kept their distance after Tamburello allegedly produced a Taser.
Tamburello then allegedly reached into the car and grabbed what Jenkins wrote was an ax and what Griffin said was a "maul or a pickax."
Every witness in Jenkins' affidavit said they saw Tamburello chasing Bolaski and his friends down the hill, toward the grass lot where trucks and campers were parked Sunday night.
The witnesses also agree that Tamburello used the weapon to strike Bolaski's Ford truck several times.
From that point, depictions of the following events vary.
OK, apparently the police believed this Ucci guy. now i have a few questions. Why did Ucci call Tamburello to meet? Tamburello promised revenge on everyone? who is everyone? and revenge for what? Did Bolaski bring guns with intent, or was it for protection from the threats of Saturday? Or does Bolaski just keep guns in his vehicle all the time like allot of the Vermonters do, including myself? Does Tamburello own any firearms? why did Tamburello have a taser and ax in his car? if Tamburello felt threatened enough to use his taser and everyone backed off, why didn't he just drive off? Were all these people friends at one time, and perhaps Ucci was try to get them to reconcile?
So I am left with what the herald prints. which is: Tamburello shows up knowing that Bolaski is there and Tamburello produces the first TWO weapons. Bolaski retreats to his truck (at an unknown distance away). Police, witnesses, prosecutor and Grand Jury all agree the first shoot was self defense. I most agree.
If no-one can show me a crime committed by Bolaski, that led to Tamburello going after him with an ax, then i have to say self defence. and these other charges after that are irrelevant and a waist of the courts time and our money.
However, if you can prove a criminal act by Bolaski, that directly provoked Tamburello to go after him with a weapon.... Than I will be happy to tie the noose Knots for all involved!
-- Posted by T BONE on Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 12:00 am EST

report this comment



I do agree with you Richard some of his reactions were out of being scared for his life and no one can say what they would do unless they are in that place. I am all for protecting yourself against people out to harm you and yes i beleive this Vincent was not fully innocent in this case but hes the only one that was even hurt and killed in this, everyone else walked away without a scratch. It takes a split second to pull a trigger out of scaredness, but it takes something else that i will never understand to shoot again after the threat is down or running away from you (dont beleive any man would continue to persue someone with a rifle even if they had an axe)and then walk up and beat him in the face with a butt of a gun and have friends kicking him while hes dying on the ground. For what ever reason they met up at the ball field (fight night before, bag of pot) this is something they all should be held responsible for. Art. 12 for you to say that you are ashamed that you fought for our country you dont deserve to live in it, move to mexico or canada please do our state a favor.
-- Posted by Maureen Gould on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 7:39 pm EST

report this comment



I was not at the scene, but the incident occurred at the softball field in my home town in which I played softball at for 7 years. I knew at least 10 unbiased people that were at the field and watched all of the event happen. I also know many of the group that went after Tamburello, as I went to school with a few of them, and to say that I think all of them should be in jail is an understatement! I cannot say that I don't think some of Bolaski's reaction was not defensive, and I probably would have just made the first shot count! However, based on eye witnesses, all close to 300 pounds of Tamburello was in a blind rage and the only reason he did not get to either of the Bolaski's is because they got around the truck before he got to them, which is why he started smashing it. For Art 16, trust me, I believe more in defending one's self than most people, and I would more than likely shoot an aggressor myself rather than call the cops. However, if we could get one Pyscho off this planet (Tamburello), and then get a clean sweep with putting the rest of the other group in jail, whether it be for murder, robbery, drugs, or any of the other offenses that these guys have committed over the past 10 years, southern Vermont would be a better place to live in!
-- Posted by Richard Putnam on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 7:16 pm EST

report this comment



I don't know if I can agree with you either, Richard. I would certainly run if someone was chasing me with an ax. And yes, I would have called the cops while I was running. None of them did. They could have because they had a phone on them. Witness testimony clarifies that.

When Tamburello was smashing the truck, I don't believe anyone but the truck was in danger. In fact, unless that truck wasn't insured, Bolaski wouldn't have lost anything.

On the other hand, when Bolaski loaded that rifle, everyone on that field was in danger. A high-powered rifle shot at close range? The shot that passed through that man could have easily killed any child on that field.

If put myself in Tamburello's shoes and was smashing the truck, when I saw someone pointing a rifle at me I may have done the same thing he did; or may have dropped it. I don't know. What I do know is, if I was Bolaski and saw this guy smashing my truck I think it would have taken less time and energy for me to call the cops rather than retrieve a rifle, load it, then pull the trigger twice.

Why the rifle butt to the face? This man was down. Why the kicks? If I was running away from an ax-wielding 300 pound guy, it would be to get away. I certainly wouldn't go back and kick him while he lay dying. To say Tamburello was bent on committing murder, I haven't read anything on that. I don't remember anything ever written that states that. I also don't remember reading anything that states he is 300 pounds. Did you know him?

I don't have to read anymore to know that Vermont has gone down the tubes. I don't have to turn the TV on either. All I have to do is look out my window.

I'm going to keep a close eye on this case. If Bolaski and Arbuckle walk then Robert Sands should walk with them. I'm not happy with his views on a lot of things, including his soft stance on drugs. We need people governing this state with a firm hand on any issue that creates a threat to us, not someone who will turn his back on them.

As for this Bolaski kid; karma. We don't have to worry about this kid running for office, so we don't have to vote for him. The streets will take care of him, but we have to take extra care on who we vote for.
-- Posted by My two cents on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 6:50 pm EST

report this comment



Thank you to the rest of you sane people ,that actually live in the same town as these people ,as do i ,and know them and the situation that went along with this killing. Thank you for sticking up for me against this psycho that writes about stories he has no clue about.
-- Posted by Maureen Gould on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 6:31 pm EST

report this comment



Article 16 You are crazy, you sit and defend people for crimes they did intentionally and then attack people for tragic accidents. What the hell is wrong with you? I am ashamed to live in the same state as a person like you and find your attacking words slightly disturbing and wouldnt be surprised to read an article about you in this paper commiting more crimes than you can be put back in the system( as you already admit you've been). I find you words to be threatening maybe you to will get just what you deserve (locked up in pyscho ward or jail). To say that any person gets what they desrve to be brutally murdered is sick and i hope his family is reading your disgusting words. Before i just thought you were stupid now i beleive you are truly CRAZY!!!!!!!
-- Posted by Maureen Gould on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 6:21 pm EST

report this comment



I can't imagine why you would get so upset at a woman Art. And then you lash out at her. I'm really beginning to wonder if you're a Vermonter. While thankful you served four years, I wonder if you did it at a time of peace. My point is you're sickened by defending the likes of Maureen yet you make no mention of being sick for defending the likes of the Bolaskis. I believe what Maureen was trying to say was, any self-respecting Vermonter who read the details of this senseless killing would not talk in such a fashion.

You say this man deserved to be kicked while dying and you worship the men who did this yet; someone should go to jail for killing someone while driving? I'm not sure if I understand the logic. This is not the way we Vermonters think. This Bolaski kid had his thoughts about him. He had a choice to call the police and chose not to. The drunk driver was impaired. I'm sure that driver regrets that drive. I'm sure that driver relives that nightmare every waking moment. How about Bolaski? How about Arbuckle?

Let's talk about Arbuckle. A man's man. He waits until the damage was done. He waits until the threat was neutralized and face crushed with the butt end of that rifle then Arbuckle goes in for the coupe de gras and kicks him. A man's man that Arbuckle.

Is that really the way you want people to look at you Art? I've read other posts of yours and sometimes you make valid points, other times you seem bitter and most of the time you;re angry. Why not channel that anger into the good of Vermont and help rid Vermont of these animals that give us a bad name.

Art, while I salute you for serving our country, I ask, as a Vermonter that you please don't disgrace those of us who believe Vermont can be a better place without the Bolaskis and Arbuckles.
-- Posted by My two cents on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 3:57 pm EST

report this comment



Dad,
So if everybody hates these people so much how come they still exist? And as far as my comment to Maureen I never said put the man in jail for life for the crash that killed his girl friend. Just defending my honor thats all. Calling in artillery because I am surrounded by liberals....DANGER CLOSE!!!!!
-- Posted by Article 16 Vt. Constitution on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 3:47 pm EST

report this comment



Article 16 you shouldn't insult someone just because they disagree with you. I thought you were a little out of line. A lot of people jump to conclusions at the 1st stories they hear, I have friends in the police dept. and the whole thing started at Blanchards by girls fighting. In Blanchards first statement (he had 3) he said Tamburello broke up the girls fighting then got in his car and drove away. He was then Pursued by Ben, Blanchard, Gibb and a couple more. They tried to run Tamburello off the road. When they got to the house they got out of the truck, pushed the mother and Gibb spit in Tamburello's face, then Tamburello hit him and knocked him out. The police came and took Tamburello's statement but not Blanchard and them because they fled. And it was the next day that Blanchard called Bolaski's to take care of Tamburello. So you see Article 16, it looks like Tamburello did not start the initial argument. And if 4 men were coming after you with a loved one in the car you would also get out to confront them. Tamburello only hit the truck no one else he did not continue to chase. They should have called the cops and had him arrested but they had murder on their mind. They turned into informants to save their necks. THEY ARE INFORMANTS you can bet on that. It sickens me that Sand and the state would sacrifice mine, yours and eeveryone else's safety to put a feather in his cap. We should always hold judgement until the truth is told. These guys need to be in jail and with the help of God they will be.
-- Posted by VT Dad None on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 3:22 pm EST

report this comment



And Maureen Gould.... If you can't degrade someone properly then shut your mouth. You sound like a trouble making liberal too.
-- Posted by Article 16 Vt. Constitution on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 1:58 pm EST

report this comment



Sounds like the Hatfields and McCoys. Sorry you get the wrong impression of me folks. I have no ideas you guys hate each other so much in southern Vt. I was simply saying you get what you deserve if you threaten some ones life. Now if you want to accuse me of hating the badge then go right ahead but remember that is not true. I simply have no respect for the individuals who think they have the right to violate the laws BECAUSE they wear the badge. Richard if believe I would call the police to handle my problems then yes you would be correct BUT if that didn't work then the person that was treatening me, if they showed up at my door, would probably meet an untimely demise. Sounds like these "rats" may have gotten to you or one of your circle. I don't know about you but myself personally I volenteered to serve my country in the military and if I had known then what I see know I would not have. What ever happened to 'an eye for an eye" type of civilization? I'll tell you my opinion on that.... Liberal jerks like you is what happened to that. I can't believe I took an oath to protect your sort... Waste of four years of my life....
-- Posted by Article 16 Vt. Constitution on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 1:19 pm EST

report this comment



It's Dirty in Vermont! You have DA that didn't even need Grand Jury,then he doesn't give them any evidence. The DA is on first name basis with the defendents! Good friends with their lawyer! Allows them to change their stories in the grand jury without presenting the original statement. Whats with that? He shots a man at 30 ft away in the back and he needs a grand jury to tell him he has a murder!!!! Arbuckle, he brings one witness to the grand jury when there was at least 3!!!!Is Kyle an informer? Personally I think so. Ther is no other way he would not have been indicted for murder! As for Sands when you play with the defendants you get played yourself!
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 12:31 pm EST

report this comment



Umm...Am I the only one that sees that Tamburello was a crazy psycho willing to kill as well? Don't get me wrong, Bolaski should be going to jail for the rest of his life, and that would at least be one less scumbag off the streets of VT. However, the only reason that Tamburello is not alive and facing the same murder charges is because he didn't happen to have a gun with him, and he was not able to catch the others with his splitting mall. I have no problem with anyone making the point that Bolaski is worthless, but please do not make it sound like Tamburello was a innocent young boy, when he was actually a 300 pound grown man!
-- Posted by Richard Putnam on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 11:33 am EST

report this comment



VTDad??? I remember when I was proud to say that. Raising my kids in the Springfield area used to be fun. I couldn't get out now if I wanted to. I wouldn't get what my home is worth. It sickens me more and more each day when I read the newspaper. With people loke the Bolaskis,Uccis, and Blanchards roaming the area, my property value will plummet. I imagine I would make a profit if I sold tomorrow, but I wouldn't be able to buy. As far as Sands goes VTDad makes a valid point. Although I didn't vote for this guy, he was elected. I know he isn't directly involved with the plummeting housing market, but he definitrly contributes by going soft on drugs and allowing murderers to walk the streets of, of all places, the same streets my children and I walk. Can we let him do this to our kids? What's going to happen to our kids, and our kids kids if his views on drugs become law. We as a people have to stand together and stop all this killing, robbing, and drugs but we have to start at the top. If we don't then we only jave ourselves to blame. I personally will not watch my kids succumb to the streets. Because of my daughters knowledge of the Bolaskis and their band of misfits, I've taken an interest in this trial. I'd like to see Sands in action. If anyone has any idea of when these cowards are going to court, please let me know. The way this trial goes depends on my votes.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 11:14 am EST

report this comment



I agree with Eric. Thaese guys are drug dealers and bad news.I'm from Springfield and have kept my sons away from them. They slaughtered a man that wanted to start a new life in our great State and instead he is lured to his death. There were many ways out for these murderers. First of all they should not have even been involved in the argument. It was none of their business. Then they took rifles to meet him. They approached him first with his fiance in the car. What would any of you have done if that was you? Would you do everything to protect your loved one? You know you would. They could have ran away and had Tamburello arrested, instead they chose to kill him! Are these the guys you want on the street?? I hope not.
And I can't believe the authorities are coddling them. Why? Only one reason. THEY ARE INFORMANTS FOR THE STATE!! So they have sacrificed this young man and all of our lives and safety to these murderers. Forget about the deals. Do your job and get them the way you should. By good hard work. I do not want my family sacrificed so Sand and the state can put a feather in their cap. But there is blood on their hands.
Wake up Vermont. I agree that if you were at the field and can help I urge you to do so, before one of our loved one's becomes the victims of these scumbags. And believe me it will happen! they tasted blood and feel invincible. I can tell you one thing. At the next elections I know who I don't want in there. The same people who let the murderers roam free at our expense. To try to put a feather in their cap. But that cap is filled with blood. I can't fathom what the Tamburello family is going through. They came for justice and we slapped them in the face. But I applaud them for not giving up in their fight to find justice for their son! I say we because I am a part of this great state and I feel personally responsible because I voted for these great defenders of justice. Which will not happen again!
I say forget the deals with those informants and do the right thing and get them off the streets. You know as well as I do that they will resume their drug dealing but now with a feeling of invincibility. They are protected by the state. Sand and everyone involved has let this state down. We are now reviled and hated by everyone outside of Vermont. And do they care?? Only time will tell. Do the right thing. If my kids had any information that would help the Tamburello's get justice As a parent I would drag them down to the police and make them tell the truth. I urge you all to do as well. God help us if they get away with this.
-- Posted by VT Dad None on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 10:20 am EST

report this comment



Art. 16 thinks someome who has too much too drink and get in an acccident with death involved should go to jail for life according to past a posting but shooting then kicking people while they r dying is OKAY with him and T Bone should read up before commenting on stories
-- Posted by Maureen Gould on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 10:13 am EST

report this comment



I found this article also. Tristan Blanchard was there. He corroborates the transfer of the guns. He also states they never called the cops. Why? If you know this kid is dangerous why even meet up with him. I am a large man and like to think I can take care of myself but I would never meet up with a man I believe to be the ax wielding maniac they make Tamburello out to be. The Bolaskis were clearly drinking. What were they thinking when they went down to that field and saw all those people there. They, not amburello, endangered the lives of all those people that day. Just like they endanger the lives of anyone they continue to meet. I'm curious why Ucci and Blanchard aren't being charged. In the act of a felony, all accomplices are as guilty as the felon that commited the crime. Something stinks about this case. I'm smelling cheese.

Chester murder victim was shot in the back


By ERIC FRANCIS -- Contributing Writer
Monday, September 22, 2008 9:13 PM



CHESTER -- The second -- and fatal -- shot that killed Vinny Tamburello last Sunday evening on a ball field in Chester was fired into his lower back and not his belly as first reported, Vermont's Chief Medical Examiner's Office concluded during an autopsy performed this week in Burlington.

"The back-to-front direction of travel of the fatal shot undermines (Kyle Bolaski's) claim that the deceased was pursuing him and that he shot the fatal round in self-defense," Windsor County State's Attorney Robert Sand wrote in a motion which asks the court to increase the bail for shooter Kyle Bolaski of Springfield from $100,000 clear up to a quarter of a million dollars.

A bail review hearing has been scheduled for Wednesday morning at 9 a.m. at the Windsor District Courthouse in downtown White River Junction to consider Sand's request in light of both the new medical evidence and additional witness statements that have since been obtained by police detectives.

Bolaski, 24, pleaded not guiolty to second-degree murder and aggravated assault with a weapon last Monday afternoon during an arraignment in which his public defender, attorney Kevin Griffin, described Bolaski as a young man who had simply been in the wrong place at the wrong time when he suddenly found himself on the receiving end of an axe-swinging attack by the enraged Tamburello.

Based on that account, Sand stressed to the court that he was not prosecuting Bolaski for the first shot he fired - which had hit Tamburello, 32, in the leg resulting in a relatively small, non-life-threatening gunshot wound -- but rather for his second shot to the lower torso which ultimately led Tamburello to bleed to death just over an hour later.

The supplemental affidavit filed by state police against Bolaski said it was discovered at autopsy that the entry wound for the second shot was located on Tamburello's lower back, "just left of the buttock centerline, near his waistline," and that the "jagged flesh wound" which police on the scene had described seeing near Tamburello's pelvic area was actually the exit wound.

Witnesses told police that Kyle Bolaski's second shot -- which occurred just moments after Kyle's younger brother Cory Bolaski fired two warning shots into the ground in front of Tamburello -- occurred after Kyle "pursued" Tamburello as the wounded man tried to retreat behind Bolaski's pickup truck. Once Tamburello collapsed from the impact of that second hit, witnesses said, Kyle Bolaski ran up and struck him several times in the face with the butt of his high-powered 30-06 rifle, actions which led to the filing of the aggravated assault charge.

The autopsy confirmed that Tamburello had "suffered fractures" around his eye socket leading credence to reports he had been struck repeatedly with the heavy gunstock.

In the initial confused hours following the shooting, witnesses who knew both men characterized Bolaski as a friend of people who Tamburello had been threatening during the preceeding days and thus as someone who just happened to be at the wrong place when Tamburello came calling.

That impression was reinforced in the courtroom last Monday when defense attorney Kevin Griffin explained to Judge Kathleen Manley that the axe-wielding charge into an angry group moments by Tamburello moments before he was shot was the "tip of the iceberg" when it came to violent acts he'd committed in recent weeks. Griffin said that but for being at the ball field with those friends, what had preceeded Sunday's confrontation, "had absolutely nothing to do with Kyle," and he added that Bolaski did not even know Tamburello.

It now appears that on the same afternoon Bolaski was using those arguments as part of his defense, his version of events was being unraveled back at the state police barracks in Rockingham where detectives were interviewing his friend Tristan Blanchard, 22, of Chester who gave a completely different account of how the Bolaski brothers and their rifles came to be at the ball field that evening.

State police said that when they interviewed Kyle Bolaski about the shooting just before midnight last Sunday he told them the reason he was able to grab a 30-06 semi-automatic rifle from his truck, and that his younger brother Cory was able to come up with a .22 caliber rifle from the same cab moments later, was because he "always" kept rifles in his truck and used them to hunt coyotes whenever he was scouting for deer.

Police said that Blanchard told them that he and the Bolaskis were all in Cory Bolaski's truck along with their friend Jerry Ucci, 21, late Sunday afternoon while, "Kyle and Jerry were drinking Budweiser," which was when Ucci decided to call Tamburello on his cell phone.

"Blanchard advised he couldn't hear what Vinny was saying but could tell that the conversation was heated and that Jerry made arrangements with Vinny to meet at the baseball field. Blanchard then advised that Jerry contacted Timothy Arbuckle who was at (McKenzie Field) and told him they were on their way and that Vinny was going to meet them there," Vermont State Police Detective Sgt. Walter Smith wrote in his affidavit.

Next, according to Blanchard, the quartet decided that because the fuel was low in Cory Bolaski's truck they would drive back to his residence and switch to Kyle's pickup for the trip to McKenzie Field. "Kyle transferred the (30-06) rifle from Cory's truck into his," police quoted Blanchard as explaining. "Blanchard advised that that Cory went into the house and came out with a second rifle and placed it inside Kyle's truck as well (then) they all proceeded to (McKenzie) field."

"I asked Blanchard if, while arrangements were being made to meet Vinny at the ball field and seeing alcohol and firearms being brought into the situation, if any one of them thought to use his cell phone to call the police and he advised they did not," Detective Sgt. Smith noted.

Smith said that during the interview, which was tape recorded, Blanchard claimed that when they arrived at the ball field and noticed there were quite a few people there, including families, because a ball game had just ended, that he, "told Cory he didn't like what was happening."

Blanchard told police it was Kyle Bolaski, Tim Arbuckle, and Jerry Ucci who walked up the slope to confront Tamburello who at first was holding up a stun gun and clicking it at them until he suddenly pulled an axe from the car that he'd arrived in and began chasing the group down the hill with it raised over his head.

Blanchard said he only saw Tamburello hitting Kyle Bolaski's truck with the axe and added that he was still running in the opposite direction when he heard "one or more" gunshots and "turned around to see Vinny lying on the ground," Smith wrote. "Blanchard advised he turned back and continued to run away and then heard several more gunshots."

Other witnesses told police they saw Tamburello bash out the windows of Bolaski's truck, then saw Bolaski exit the passenger side with the high-powered rifle at which point at least one witness said Tamburello raised his axe at Kyle Bolaski before Bolaski shot him in the leg. Windsor County State's Attorney Robert Sand had said last Monday that the sequence of events available to authorities at that point led him to conclude that first shot was justifiable as self-defense but Sand took a dimmer view in the motion he filed later in the week.

"Although (Bolaski) claims the guns were in his vehicle as a result of an earlier deer scouting trip, newly-received information makes clear that the guns were deliberately placed in (Bolaski's) truck in anticipation of a confrontation," Sand wrote.

Among the police reports filed by Sand in support of his motion was a narrative by Springfield Police Officer Dean Fullerton who described his uncompleted investigation into the events involving Tamburello almost exactly 24 hours before he was shot.

Fullerton said Springfield Police received a report of a large fight on Summer Street early Saturday evening and when he arrived he found, "10 or 12 people yelling and separating themselves."

Fullerton listed that several people who ended up at the ball field the next evening who were also involved one way or another in Saturday night's incident, including Tristan Blanchard, and Fullerton said both sides charged members of the other side had brandished either knives, tire irons, or been involved in trying to run vehicles off the road both in Chester and Springfield.

"The story is confusing and it didn't make sense," Fullerton wrote in his affidavit, adding that while Tamburello and his friends had given statements that night, at least four people on the other side, including Blanchard, had not yet provided written statements so the incident remained unresolved. "The case is pending -- more investigation needed," Fullerton wrote, adding, "When I (get the other statements) possible charges could be made."
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 8:50 am EST

report this comment



I found this article if it will help you TBone.

http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080819/NEWS04/808190384/1003/NEWS02

According to this not only did they lure him down that field with a score to settle but all four kids approached the car. You may be right about self-defense but not for the Bolaskis, Blanchard, or Ucci. For the Tamburello kid. According to witness accounts Tamburello only had his girlfriend with him. If my math is right that would be four on one. Why transfer the rifle from the trucks? Why bring the second one from the house? It's clear what the Bolaskis intended on doing. My daughter tells me they are heavy into drugs. She pulled one of their pictures up on facebook with Corey Bolaski and his sister smoking a joint to prove it. These kids are no good. Although Tamburello had no right to bust their truck up, these kids had no right to kill him in the fashion they did. I agree with Sands when he says the hunted became the hunter, and I believe these kids should go to jail for their actions. Thank god my daughter is away at school. I can't believe I'm about to say I believe she's better off in another state but that's the way it is. God forbid something should happen to her there but I think it would hurt me more to know that she was harmed by a neighbor. Bolaski could have taken out Tamburello's knee cap and let the law take it from there. His rage surpassed Tamburellos when he fired that second shot. On top of that he shot him in the back with that second shot. In my eyes, no one in Vermont is safe with this kid walking our streets. Especially now. He got his first human kill, anything after is sport. And if Staples is right and he is ratting then all Vermont citizens are fair game.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 8:15 am EST

report this comment



Please show me something were it says they planed to meet. This is only the second article i have read on this case. And in neither one did i ever read anything about a planed meet between Arbuckle, Tamburello or Bolaski. If this was a planed meet, depending on the circumstances, i may change my opinion. so until i see some more info. on this, I'm sticking to my guns. SELF-DEFENSE!
-- Posted by T BONE on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 11:28 pm EST

report this comment



P.S...I'm interested in hearing what Michelle Mcphee has to say about this. I wasn't on the receiving end of that rifle, but after reading that passage, I feel his pain. Again, I'd like to extend my condolences to the Tamburello family. Please don't think all of us are like that.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 10:32 pm EST

report this comment



I'm with my two cents on this one. I've watched Springfield deteriorate over the years and, like my two cents, I fear raising a family here. What ever happened to the day when we could leave our doors unlocked? It seems like we have more to worry about with our own neighbors than the transients who pass through. As a citizen of this once great state of Vermont, I would like to extend my sympathies to the Tamburello family. Reading the words of witness Keith Destromp tore me apart. Although I don't know these kids personally, I have heard of them. It saddens me to know that my daughter had any relations with these kids. But I am also thankful that she was smart enough to get away from them. They are bad news and after listening to the things my little girl had to say about them I too believe they had a score to settle. I too believe that they lured that boy down to that field. Wake up people. I keep hearing we have to protect our own, but I never thought I'd see the day when we would have to protect our own from our own. Anyone on that field that day should come forward and do what's right. Cage this person for being the beast he is.
-- Posted by Cool Hand Luke on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 10:23 pm EST

report this comment



Was anyone hurt by the victim??? NO
Did anyone who set the victim up to meet at the park need medical attention?? NO
Was anyone cut by the victim?? NO
Did the victim use force??? NO
Could the people that were so afraid have ran??? YES because they were at a park, but some decided no to if they all left the park this would not of happened?????
Self Defense NOT
Premediated???? YES
Joint Venture???? YES
All talked about what they were going to do??? WITHOUT A DOUBT
Cruel & Abusitive Treatment??? WITHOUT A DOUBT
Took advantage of victim who was down and out and not able to do anything, but take more abuse??? VERY SAD NO FEELINGS HOW WOULD THEY LIKE IT IF IT WAS ONE OF THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS. I don't know if they would care.

God Bless the Victim and his Family

Angel Girl
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 10:01 pm EST

report this comment



To help make it easier here is the link to Michelle McPhee
http://www.969wtkk.com/, CLICK LISTEN LIVE
-- Posted by Deb Auch on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 8:24 pm EST

report this comment



My Two Cents,
Thank you for your eloquent letter of observations of the obvious....

I would like to extend and invitation to Vermont Citizen's to listen to Michelle Mcphee on 96.9 FM Tomorrow night at 9:00PM,regarding the murder of Vincent Tamburello.You can connect to this radio station through the internet if you cannot obtain this station the usual way.

If you have information and want to remain anonymous you can listen to the show and email Michelle Mcphee.

Thank you, GOD BLESS.
-- Posted by Deb Auch on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 7:20 pm EST

report this comment



T Bone: I have to admit; I was impressed with your dissection of my previous post, and then I read "guilty contagious." You leave that alone, yet you realize you left an 'o' out of floor. That blew it for me.

FYI: Guilty conscience is a feeling of shame when you do something immoral, which is exactly what this Bolaski kid did - something immoral. I get a kick out of posters like you. You lurk these sites, toss out a whole mess of babbling banter, and then chuckle to yourself when "you think" you've hit a nerve. But, again, you use words like "guilty contagious." After I picked myself off the floor, from laughing so hard, I realized I can't top that. I love a good joke and I appreciate the time you took to share that with me.

As far as the topic goes; no criminal walks away from the brutality of a crime like this without buying their way out with information on something else. You don't need an education to figure this out. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest to see some upper echelon drug dealers wondering why Bolaski isn't getting charged with murder. This is a clear cut case. There's only two ways anyone would submit a lesser charge on a vicious crime like this. One: The DA didn't submit the case appropriately to the Grand Jury, or Two: that DA deliberately withheld information to protect an informant.

Things that make you go - HMMMMMMMM
-- Posted by Randall Staples on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 6:45 pm EST

report this comment



Born and raised in Bradford, I can say we don't need any of these people in Vermont. T Bone, either you're not from here or you're this Bolaski kid. I can't understand why anyone would defend someone like this. Although I don't agree with some of the things posted here, I do disagree with your way of thinking. No civilized person in any society would condone this action. And certainly, no self respecting Vermonter would.

I raise five children alone. I pay my taxes, and I rise with the sun to work my butt off so my kids can avoid people like this. I am proud of who I am, and what I do, but more than that, I am proud of my children. There has been a major spike in violent crimes in this wonderful State of ours. Although I fear leaving this State; I also fear raising my children elsewhere.

I have to wonder why this case hasn't been given the attention it deserves. The facts are clear. The Bolaskis enticed this kid to meet them at the park. They intentionally transfered the rifle from truck to truck and then retrieved another rifle from the house. Why? To shoot coyotes. That doesn't sound right to me. They were already done with their hunt for deer. They weren't happy with that though. They had a score to settle. And they enticed this poor kid down to that field for that reason. Somewhere out there, there are some grieving parents. Not just the Tamburellos, but the Bolaski parents also. I am sure the Bolaski parents have asked themselves, "where did I go wrong" on numerous occasions. I know I would be saddened if my kid acted in such a vicious manner to someone they barely knew.

No justice will ever heal the wounds these to sets of parents nurse on a daily basis, but we, as Vermonters, cannot defend the actions of this man.

I'm ashamed to live in the same state of these posters who condone this action. I'm ashamed of a jury that cannot bring justice to the people they break bread with, and I'm ashamed of a Judicial system that cannot defend the very people that pay their salary. Moreso, I'm ashamed of people like Kyle Bolaski

Kyle Bolaski, although not tried at this pont, is not the type of person Vermont breeds. We are peaceful people who choose to live in Vermont to get away from people like him. I have to end this with, someone died savagely on that field on that day, and someone should be punished for it. If Bolaski gets away with this, then I have to believe that someone is saying something. No-one gets away with killing anyone unless they have something to give in return and for that I am deeply ashamed because we don't raise turncoats either. We keep to ourselves and let justice take its course. Unfortunately, Justice turned its back on the very people they are supposed to protect. Us, the taxpayers.
-- Posted by My two cents on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 5:02 pm EST

report this comment



Is everybody blind. They had these guys cold. There are too many witnesses and evidence against them. These guys are informants. Especially the Bolaski crew. They made a deal to save their butts. I can guarantee. There will be more about their plea deals with the D.A. I know for a fact this is what happened. Youshoul
-- Posted by vince tamburello on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 4:02 pm EST

report this comment



my bad! i meant floor.
-- Posted by T BONE on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 1:32 pm EST

report this comment



Randall: you speak like you resent the badge. People like you, who resent the badge, are the first to dial 911 when kids like Bolaski shows up at your door. This Bolaski character is a threat to society.

T Bone: cant speak for Art.16. Myself, i would drag his lifeless corpse out to the dumpster ( so he don't mess up my Flor )and call my lawyer, not 911.

Randall: "I willing to bet this guy never smashed a deer in the head with the butt of his rifle after he "neutralized" the animal." T Bone: neutralized deer ( down but not dead) = knife to throat - neutralized assailant with an ax that meant me harm = any blunt instrument ( including kicking) to inflict as much pain & discomfort as possible, till death do us part!

Randall: What gives him the right to do that to a human being?

T Bone: Self defense and the will too live!

Randall: What makes anyone think they can get away with that, unless they were protected.

T Bone: basic instinct and again the will too live.

Randall: By who, you ask? Who protects informants? That's why he did what he did to that man on that field. Because he knew he could get away with it. When you're a "rat," you get perks.

T Bone: sounds like you may have some inside info.. Are you a cop? are you a friend/relative of Tamburello Jr / family? a lawyer perhaps? what gives, with a statement like that?

Randall: And T Bone, I know your first question can't be serious, so I will ignore your ignorance on that one.

T Bone: the question was; "Is there a such a thing as excessive force in a self defense situation?" yes, it was sarcastic. i do not believe there is a such a thing as excessive force in a self defense situation.

Randall: as far as being above the law, well, when you work with them and "rat" on those you deal with...

T Bone: How do you know that he is a rat?

Randall: although you may not be above the law, you can definitely get away with breaking it. Think about it.

T Bone: huh? you should think about it.( I just couldn't ignore your ignorance on that one)

Randall: Only a rat could get away with doing something like this. Ask Whitey Bulger, he can verify that.

T Bone: "a grand jury declined to return a charge of either murder or manslaughter" those are pretty serious charges. What is he, ratting out the mafia?

Randall: This Bolaski kid is a double threat to anyone in Vermont. If he doesn't shoot you, he'll rat on you.

T Bone: Well for one thing, i don't think i will give him a reason too shoot me ( such as try and mutilate him with an ax ). Secondly, it sounds like you have a guilty contagious. or perhaps he may have ratted on you for something. You use the term 'rat' an awful lot in your post. what exactly do you know that the herald is not printing?
-- Posted by T BONE on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 1:25 pm EST

report this comment



WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING KICKED WHILE YOUR DYING
TRY COWARD
HE WOULD NOT HAVE CHASED VERMONTERS AROUND IF THEY DID NOT CALL HIM DOWN
HOW CONVENIENT THEY HAD SHOTGUNS AT A BASEBALL GAME
THINK ABOUT IT
-- Posted by DENISE SNELDERS on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 12:25 pm EST

report this comment



Article 16: you speak like you resent the badge. People like you, who resent the badge, are the first to dial 911 when kids like Bolaski shows up at your door. This Bolaski character is a threat to society. I willing to bet this guy never smashed a deer in the head with the butt of his rifle after he "neutralized" the animal. What gives him the right to do that to a human being? What makes anyone think they can get away with that, unless they were protected. By who, you ask? Who protects informants? That's why he did what he did to that man on that field. Because he knew he could get away with it. When you're a "rat," you get perks.

And T Bone, I know your first question can't be serious, so I will ignore your ignorance on that one. But as far as being above the law, well, when you work with them and "rat" on those you deal with then, although you may not be above the law, you can definitely get away with breaking it. Think about it. Only a rat could get away with doing something like this. Ask Whitey Bulger, he can verify that. This Bolaski kid is a double threat to anyone in Vermont. If he doesn't shoot you, he'll rat on you.
-- Posted by Randall Staples on Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 10:33 am EST

report this comment



Just goes to show how bad the state wants to extort money from their citizens... Grand Jury comes back with no charges so States Attorney wants to look like a heroe and find something to charge him with. Thats pretty weak. How about a Medal of Valor for protecting the people in the park? Mr. Sand let it go, move on to the next case... Not Guilty, Self Defense... Cut and Dry.
-- Posted by Article 16 Vt. Constitution on Wed, Jan 28, 2009, 3:21 pm EST

report this comment



The D.A.s office must think, if they cant charge the dead guy, then charge the victim. Obviously the courts are not about justice anymore, they are about conviction ratings. WAKE UP people.
-- Posted by T BONE on Wed, Jan 28, 2009, 3:19 pm EST

report this comment



Is there a such a thing as excessive force in a self defense situation???????? it seems very strange to me, how the police, D.A.s, and courts have a way of making criminals out of victims. And i agree with you Art.16. If someone went after a cop with an ax, and the cop emptied his gun in to him, then tazzed him and kicked him and anything else, there badge alone some how justifies it! No-one is supposed to be above the law. So why are they?
-- Posted by T BONE on Wed, Jan 28, 2009, 3:12 pm EST

report this comment



What's the differance between be kicked while your dying (which he probably deserved) or being tazered while your handcuffed???? Obviously just a badge.... Bottom line you shouldnt chase a Vermonter around with an axe threatening to chop them up and not expect to be shot or worse...
-- Posted by Article 16 Vt. Constitution on Wed, Jan 28, 2009, 1:56 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout