RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

O'Reilly's bigotry has no place in Vermont



Toolbox

By BILL LOFY - Published: May 17, 2007

Last Saturday was in most ways a typical final day of a legislative session in Montpelier — exhausted legislators scrambled to finish work on important bills, debated long into the night, and went home having accomplished significant progress on the priorities of the state. But something else happened that day that left many legislators and political observers on all sides of the political spectrum unsettled, angry, and worried.

That morning, Rep. Bill Lippert, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, was eating breakfast in the Statehouse cafeteria when a news crew from the Fox News program "The O'Reilly Factor" approached him. In a menacing tone, with cameras running, a producer for the show asked Rep. Lippert misleading questions that effectively accused him of protecting child predators because he opposes Jessica's Law, which would impose 25-year mandatory minimum sentences on sex offenders.

Data from the U.S. Department of Justice show that 25-year minimums, by discouraging plea bargains, can actually undermine the chances of getting a conviction and increase the likelihood of a sex offender walking free without serving any time (many victims refuse to testify at trial and the burden of proof is so onerous that offenders are often acquitted). Because of those facts, Rep. Lippert, along with the Vermont Network Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, opposes the bill.

But facts won't get in O'Reilly's way. Ignoring Rep. Lippert's support for tough sex offender bills that actually work, the Fox News producers singled out Lippert as someone who wants to make Vermont's children more vulnerable.

On Monday's program, O'Reilly was almost gleeful in condemning Rep. Lippert for his alleged sympathy for child predators. In a segment called "The Truth About Vermont," O'Reilly accused Rep. Lippert of favoring transgender Vermonters over child victims, despite the fact that a transgender anti-discrimination bill that Lippert supports was also passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee and supported by Gov. Douglas.

So why would Fox News ambush Bill Lippert, one of the most respected members of the Legislature?

The answer is as simple as it is unsettling: Rep. Lippert is gay. As a leader in the effort to pass Vermont's landmark civil union legislation a few years ago, Representative Lippert has been a target of anti-gay vitriol for several years. His defense of civil rights for gays and lesbians has rankled a small but vocal group both inside and outside of Vermont that relies on hateful and threatening rhetoric to promote its anti-gay agenda.

Consider some of the e-mails Rep. Lippert has received since the O'Reilly program aired:

"If I were you, I would seriously consider killing myself."

"I hope you get the s—- beat out of you on a regular basis."

"I also hope that the people of Vermont 'purges' [sic] their system of you liberal, evil, 'infections' soon."

"I hope you die."

And these were just the printable comments; others were far worse.

It should go without saying that this kind of rhetoric, which O'Reilly's show encourages every day, has no place in Vermont. But here we are in 2007, and homophobia is alive and well. As the nation engages in a long overdue debate over the offensive and racist rhetoric we hear on the airwaves from the likes of Don Imus and others, Vermonters should take no comfort in thinking that we are immune to the voices of intolerance.

In fact, we should turn our attention to a program that broadcasts right here within our borders. For the past year, one of Bill O'Reilly's best friends here in Vermont has been a radio host named Paul Beaudry, whose program on WDEV, "True North," is a veritable hate-fest. Not surprisingly, Beaudry has used this incident to crank up the gay-bashing. On Tuesday, when Rep. Anne Donahue, a Republican, called in to Beaudry's show and defended Lippert, the line suddenly went dead. It came live in time for Beaudry to take a caller who called Lippert a "sicko" and "pervert."

This is typical Beaudry: he's become obsessed with Lippert, both during last year's election season and the legislative session, accusing him of sympathizing with pedophiles simply because he's gay.

Bigots like Bill O'Reilly and Paul Beaudry have the right to free speech, but Vermonters also have the right — and responsibility — to stand up to intolerance. You don't have to go to New York or Washington to exercise that right — you can do it right here at home by calling WDEV radio and let the station and its advertisers know that you object to how the show is being used as a platform for slandering, targeting and intimidating individuals.

In response to criticism of the O'Reilly ambush on Rep. Lippert, O'Reilly's supporters argue that the group of legislators who rushed to Lippert's defense acted inappropriately.

It's true that some of these legislators were vocal and forceful in condemning the media program's tactics. While in retrospect some of them might wish they had offered a more measured response, I find it entirely understandable that lawmakers would rush to the defense of their colleague and in defense of Vermont's strong child predator laws. In fact, I couldn't agree more with one of the comments a legislator made to the Fox News producers: "Go home!"

Go home, indeed, Mr. O'Reilly, and while you're at it, take Paul Beaudry and his gay-bashing bigots with you. Hate has no place in Vermont.



Bill Lofy is a communications consultant from Jericho whose clients include the leadership of the Vermont House and Senate.








READER COMMENTS


O'Reilly is right that to deflect the argument towards homophobia is irresponsible because it avoids talking about the real problems with perverts that is increasingly plaguing this nation. For an editor to reply in such a way is deplorable and insulting, especially you would like to present yourself as objective and unbiased.

Now about morality and using government to impose moral values... and all those who use bigot as a shield….

You all really have to sit down on this one and THINK... our laws, whether you like it or not, PRESUPOSE a morality whose limits are set by the majority as a whole... point in case, i.e. abortion, divorce, homosexuality, smoke, to kill, etc... if a law states that homosexual marriage, divorce, abortion, killing, etc is ok, then that law teaches society and children that the majority believes that it is OK to do those things... Government and the laws HAVE ALLWAYS played a role in shaping the morality here in the US, Cuba, or China, by strictly enforcing the LAW or you go to JAIL... the problem is that less than 50 years ago, when this country was still holding to predominantly CHRISTIAN laws, we had a more Christian country but on the verge of collapse. With time, ignorance (blindness as to why a Christian Law is better than other alternatives) and under increasing attack by minority groups all under the banner of 'tolerance' and 'freedom of speech', these Christian laws have started to be reject and/or outlawed. This is an attack on the moral foundation of this country done by ourselves to ourselves… we all contribute to it.

THE BIGGEST MISTAKE THE U.S. IS MAKING is that in most arguments people want PARENTS to be the guardians of morality in society (both from the left and the right)... that is laughable in a society that supports divorce. Nowadays you can divorce for any reason. The tabloids keep track of Guinness record on how short a marriage lasts in Hollywood. The amount of athletes (mostly irresponsible, poorly educated youth that suddenly become rich) that have multiple kids with different women, the increasing number of divorces, the encouragement of a hedonistic promiscuous lifestyle through TV models and the increasing number of children out of wedlock that exists because of all these... begs the question... WHAT PARENTS??? if we as a society don't pass laws that HELP THESE CHILDREN (and our own) to live a higher moral life in a responsible way, then THESE CHILDREN will learn what society teaches, through TV, Internet, LAWS and the education system... they will end up like their parents and thus creating a society that little by little reject more and more the conservative (Christian) values that you so much hate to love 'OTHERS' to shove down your throat... Now, for example, as a result of the acceptance (in the law) of homosexuality, it FOLLOWS that it be taught in the classroom, and to little children because it is then when they are most either receptive/vulnerable depending on where you stand on homosexuality.

The main reason why homosexual is accepted is because it is genetic, you are born that way… it is not a psychological pathology. Well, by the same argument it follows that pedophilia perverts should have rights… because who is to say that is NOT genetics/born that way???

The problem is that the US wants to be tolerant and not offend anyone while keeping Christian values alive... a futile task because Christianity is radical, it is rational, but most people are so IGNORANT as to why Christianity is good that all they know to defend their argument is... because it says so in the bible.

I hope Vermont come to understand that you can't have it both ways... to be Responsible is not a selfish task (the good only for me, or what others do behind their bedroom door is no one’s business) but it is also a mission that should be carried over into our laws and to society... does this way of thinking make me a Chinese dictator, bigot, etc???... sort of, but I am not shoving (selfish) laws down everyones throat but Christian ones... which to explain why they are better is beyond this small forum.
-- Posted by Randal Czynk on Wed, May 30, 2007, 2:37 pm EST

report this comment



It always disappoints me when a public figure cannot or will not simply defend their position. To tap dance around the issue or just clam up speaks volumes about their credibility, or lack thereof. If Rep. Lippert has a rational reason for opposing Jessica’s Law, why doesn’t he just lay it out? Instead he chose to make himself look like a fool. Granted, the producers tone was a bit confrontational, but that doesn’t release Mr. Lippet from his obligation to explain his actions. One can only assume that he cannot. Simply saying that Vermont has strong child predator laws does not make it so.

The commentary in the Herald does attempt to justify the action with a short paragraph about data but focuses more on name calling and less than truthful claims about O’Reilly. The truth is that Mr. Lippert’s sexuality was never mentioned or implied and O’Reilly even noted that he supports the transgender legislation. The claim that O’Reilly encourages hateful rhetoric is nothing more than an outright lie. He goes out of his way to do just the opposite. It seems the truth has no place at the Herald but hate towards anyone who seeks it is alive and well.

Remember, when you cannot support your position with facts, just play that trusty old bigot card
-- Posted by Mrit Friner on Fri, May 18, 2007, 2:02 am EST

report this comment



“To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed…” - 1984 G. Orwell

Bill Lofy commits the "Big Lie" in his sophomoric commentary, foolishly aided and abetted by Editor Randall Smathers. Lofy shamelessly tosses Lippert out of the closet (nationally speaking) and the truth out the window by accusing Mr. O'Reilly of something that simply did not happen - Lippert was not nationally exposed as a homosexual until Lofy deemed it necessary in order to mischaracterize the gist of O'Reilly's scathing news item.

In short, O'Reilly and the rest of the nation could care less about Lippert's sexual orientation. What the nation cares about is Vermont, Jessica's Law and sexual predators of innocent children.

One wonders why "lofty" Lofy posits "The Big Lie"? Is it to divert attention from Vermont politicians' failure to address Jessica's Law and sexual predators of children? What dark motives would lurk within Lofy to cause him to so blatantly and crudely attempt to divert the issue from sexual predators to Bill Lippert's personal tastes?

I wonder if Messrs. Lofy and/or Smathers would care to address this question? Until then, I'll gladly keep my children out of Vermont.
-- Posted by William Roemer on Fri, May 18, 2007, 11:31 am EST

report this comment



O'Reilly regularly goes out of his way to be non judgemental about "alternative" lifestyles, I challenge you to come up with a quote that proves otherwise.

It is Lippert that is disingenuous, or maybe just an outright liar, when he claims Vermont has the toughest Child Molester laws in the nation.

And as for the lame excuses you cite for rejecting Jessica's law - give me a break!

Either intentionally, or unintentionally, you are making Vermont a haven for sexual deviants, but then maybe that was always your agenda..

God help the children of Vermont.....because you clearly won't.
-- Posted by Will Hartje on Fri, May 18, 2007, 12:47 am EST

report this comment



I am a registered independant voter; a long time Vermonter (summer resident), and VERY tolorant and supportive of both gay and lesbian issues.

However, from what I have read and heard, on both sides of this most recent issue re:Bill O'Reilly and Bill Lippett..I do not see that this discussion is about gay and lesbian issues as depicted in the Herald.

From the O'Reilly Factor show last night, it DID seem as if Mr. Lippett was barraged with questions, however, as I didn't see the Factor on Monday night, I am not certain as to whether this line of questoning was fair or not. Mr. Lippett did, however, seem rather defensive and uncomfortable answering a direct question. I wonder, why?

Instead, it does appear as though this issue IS about Vermont's negligence of enacting Jessica's Law...NOT about gay and lesbian issues.

I have worked in Psychiatry for many years; counseled countless women within domestic violent situations and little girls and grown women who have sufferred the effects of domestic violence and rape. In my experience, either they testify and deserve the justice of a perpetrator's full conviction, or they don't choose to testify and the case isn't brought to court. Unfortunatley, those who do NOT hold these terrible persons accountable, thinking that my changing their behavior, the violence will end, too often end up dead!

Your argument that stitistics support the idea that Jessica's law somehow undermines the possibility of punishment for a perpetrator just isn't LOGICAL.

If one brings charges which are proven to be true, then the perpetrator SHOULD get the maximum time for punishment. If they don't bring charges, there just isn't a case, is there?

In fact, I wish that ALL STATES would work harder to remove all statutes of limitations for filing complaints of Rape and domestic violence...as the trauma memory of these issues can last many years hidden, and memory of events(opportunity to bring charges against the perpetrator) often comes later in life...a wonderful thing for those survivors who need to "compartmentalize trauma" at the time it is happening, JUST TO SURVIVE IT.

I have not heard Mr. O'Reilly bring up the gay/lesbian issue in any of his statements. However, you place so much emphasis on the personalization of gay/lesbian issues as an attack on Mr. Lippett, by Bill O'Reilly, that the issues about justice for women and children are distanced; You don't really address WHAT you are doing, that is, what your "tough stance" is against despicable violence toward women and children in Vermont ! You don't address why so many other states have found Jessica's Law to be worth adopting in their states when it apparentally isn't supported in Vermont. Why???

I would rather you respond in clear statements what your "tough stance" actually is...and, perhaps, directly clarify that stance on Bill O'Reilly's show for us all to hear. What is your hesitation? Would someone from the Herald or Mr. Lippett, himself come to explain???

I believe that if personal accusations toward Bill O. re: the gay/lesbian issue are not made, and, instead, if one were to stick to the issue of how Vermont is holding perpetrators accountable, then Bill would allow time to make that clear and to have your case made, as what Vermont IS actually doing to address these difficult issues.

My daughter lives there...we vacation there...I want to know !!!

Thank you for this opportunity to respond in your forum...

I would welcome a response via email.
-- Posted by Nancy O'Toole on Fri, May 18, 2007, 11:33 am EST

report this comment



I listen to Bill O"Reilly on the radio and watch him on TV regularly, and have listened to him comment on the situation with Jessica's Law and Mr. Lippert's role in Vermont many times recently. Mr. O'Reilly has never once mentioned on the air that Mr. Lippert is gay.... because it is completely irrelevant. It has absolutley nothing to do with the issue of protecting children from people who would violate them in the most viscious fashion. I have an immediate relative whom was sexually molested at 6 years old by 2 men in the State of Vermont, at 33 she still bears the emotional and psychological scars of that experience....and will never fully recover from them. Mr. O'Reilly is doing the right thing in holding those people accountable who are blocking Jessica's Law from becoming a reality in Vermont. Mr. Lippert sexuality has nothing to do with O'Reilly's cause, it has never been mentioned on Mr. O'Reilly's programs, this commentary is a disgrace to the Rutland Herald and a disservice to the people of Vermont.
-- Posted by Barry Talbot on Fri, May 18, 2007, 1:51 am EST

report this comment



As a member of the US Military, it is sad when the freedoms I fight for are immorally abused. Vermont’s “most respected” member of the legislature, Rep. Lippert, deceives voters by asserting his state has the strongest sexual predator laws and the Rutland Herald defends him by calling Bill O'Reilly homophobic. It is Vermont’s right to reject Jessica’s Law; however it is the duty of Rep. Lippert and the Rutland Herald to tell the truth. Vermont deserves better than a deceitful representative and newspaper.
-- Posted by Michael Rutland on Fri, May 18, 2007, 4:51 pm EST

report this comment



You have misled your readers. Obviously you have never watched Bill's show or if you did you had your ears closed. The idea that he is homophobic is wrong and slanderous. He is just passionate about protecting children ( maybe too passionate) He never mentioned anything about anyone being gay when he was criticizing the Vermont legislature. You are the one that mentioned it. It is a great diversion, similar to when lawyers play the race card.
Also, I saw nothingmenacing or misleading when the individuals were approached by the producer.
Since you claim to have tough sex laws, I'd like you to explain some of the mild sentances or no jail time that some of your predators have received.
I live in Vermont for 4 years when I attended St. Michaels College. Things have really changed and unfortunately it's not better.
-- Posted by Robert Kelly on Fri, May 18, 2007, 4:41 pm EST

report this comment



Bill Lofy's commentary started out very good. It addressed the incident and clarified Lipperts posision. Unfortunately, his conclusion as to why O'Reilly did what he did is not supported. Some of the conculusions drawn in this commentary are quite preposterous. Primarily he concludes that O'Reily is a bigot based on the fact that he is "best friends" with radio host Paul Beaudry who is (according to Lofy) a bigot. I do not know Paul Beaudry or his show so I can not say whether or not Lofy is correct in his assesment of Beaudry but to lump O'Reilly in with him simply because he takes a topic from the O'Reilly show to discuss on his program. Furthermore, it is inappropriate to blame O'Reilly or his program because some small minded people send emails to Lippert that are full of hate. He is not responsible for these small minded comments. If you want to accuse O'Reilly of being Anti-Gay and bigotted you really should be able to back that up. He may be Anti-Far Left Liberal and he certainly has an agenda in place to get Jessica's law passed in every state and he is not afraid to be a hard hitter to get that done. Much the same as the Gay movement has been a hard hitter in passing Anti-Discrimination legislation. Bill Lofy, please be fair and honest in how you present someone. This is shameful.
-- Posted by None None on Fri, May 18, 2007, 3:14 pm EST

report this comment



It is possible that Vermonter's have a different sense than the rest of the country as to the advisability of either Jessica's Law or a transgender anit-discrimination legislation. But when non-Vermonter's are told that the state of Vermont has stiff laws against child predator's, and a rapist of a child receives probation, one must wonder what penalties would be dished out in Vermont to a child rapist if the state had lenient laws against rape.

If probation for the rape of a child makes sense to Vermont citizens, but laws need to be legislated to protect transgender citizen's, it strikes non-Vermonter's that the moral compass of Vermont legislators may be malfunctioning. For Bill Lofy to introduce to the discussion the gayness of a legislator as being THE reason for the apparent public disparity of moral outrage is truely revealing of Vermonter's priorities and as to what outrages their sensibilities.
-- Posted by Paul Larsen on Fri, May 18, 2007, 1:36 pm EST

report this comment



The only bigot in this argument is Mr. Lofy.
Mr. O'reilly never mentioned that Mr. Lippert was gay. Vermont is a haven for child predators. Your laws for these dispicable people art but a slap on hand. You reported today on a convicted sex offender who did not register as a sex offender in Bennington. This man, with a long criminal history, was given the grand sentence of 2 months in jail. Boy are you all tough on crime. O'reilly has not called on a boycott of Vermont. But I certainly will never vacation in your predator free state.
-- Posted by Ed Mendez on Fri, May 18, 2007, 12:09 pm EST

report this comment



Yes, Bill O'Reilly, get out of Vermont. And that's a standard line: If you don't like it here get out. It's been a good line for years: USA, love it or leave it. When conservatives use it, it's laughed at by liberals, who control the agenda.

I visit Vermont and spend a lot of time in Vermont. I like a lot about it. But I don't have a domicile in Vermont, for several reasons, one of which is the stigma of being associated with the sickness that is permeating the state from those liberal forces that control the media, and the state government.

Liberals dominate Vermont, and I tiptoe around them. When I deal with local government, and the people, even some with whom I disagree, I'm very pleased. But the vituperation, labeling and name calling from the Liberal opinion molders is to be avoided. For example, in the column about the O'Brien crew visit the crew is accused of speaking to the legislator in a threatening tone. Look at the video. There is nothing threatening about the tone or content of the question. And Mr. Lippert doesn't act as if he's threatened. Rather it is the threatening conduct of others toward the O'Brien crew that jumps out.

Good luck, Vermont, the playground of Liberalism. You'll need it.

Bruce Graham
JUDGEX2@CFL.RR.COM
-- Posted by Bruce Graham on Fri, May 18, 2007, 11:48 am EST

report this comment



...........posts that boycotting Vermont is a good idea as there are enough dopes here already. Huh. Now why would you say that Lem? Let me guess. You dont want your transplanted a** troubled by others who might see Vermont as a pretty and safe place to live and GOD FORBID move here. Right Lem? Wanna keep it for yourself Lem? Close the door on any growth. Keep it simple. No new stores down on route 7 south. Damn!!! Looking more like New Jersey.........Holy Cowpower Lem!!! And Wal-Mart was able to get in dispite the LOONY LEFT's best shot at keeping any business out. Right Lem? But hey Lem thanks. Really. Thanks to you LOONY LEFT for getting Vermont on FOX NEWS and turning over the rock that you people are.
Colin Bridge
-- Posted by Colin Bridge on Fri, May 18, 2007, 9:15 am EST

report this comment



Gay bashing? It sounds as though maybe you should get your story straight. I have NEVER heard Bill O'Reilly bash anyone because of their sexual preference. I don't always agree with him, but I must say that I have also never heard him call on his listeners to spew hate rhetoric as the article suggests either. I think this is a clear attempt to move as far away from the actual topic as you can. How sad that you feel the need to stand up for a grown man who should be able to defend himself, but yet you will let a helpless child be victimized for the rest of their life so that you can protect the predator...surely you can see that this isn't normal. Shame on you!
-- Posted by Name Unknown on Thu, May 17, 2007, 2:06 pm EST

report this comment



As a former resident of "New England", I am appalled that the great state of Vermont has drifted so far to the left. An idiot like Lippert gets into a position of power & politics and all the other creeps come crawling out of the woodwork to support him and his "wacky" ideas. Their impromptu performance in front of the FOX cameras was inept, and simply proved what a phony and incompetent leadership gang which Vermonters must now face up to.

Hooray for O'Reilly and his continued push in support of Jessica's law. Massive Boo's for the state of Vermont, and Lippert in particular, for not putting similarly strong child abuse and predator laws on the books.

I feel sorry for Vermont; it has placed so many "Wackos" in positions of responsibility that the state will simply continue to attract deviants and move further away from its true "New England" heritage. Sad!
-- Posted by Biz Maven on Fri, May 18, 2007, 12:14 am EST

report this comment



I heard nothing about your legislators sexuality when I heard Fox report . It was you that brought the subject up. In addition, you went into a very, very hateful commentary about Fox and O'Reilly. And, you connected both Fox and O-Reilly to some other people that I have also never heard about. I am sure that your regular readers will know all about those people based on the amount of hate you seem to have for them. So, as an outsider living in a very liberal state (Oregon), I believe that you are the one using hate. I am glad that I don't have to read your commentaries every day. I cancelled my subscription to our local paper, The Oregonian, because they would preach the same kind of hate as you seem to do. It appears to me that you liberal newspapers are the center of hate propaganda in America.
-- Posted by Geary Lewis on Thu, May 17, 2007, 11:57 pm EST

report this comment



Is that you DO NOT Believe in the "Freedom of Speech". Freedom of Speech does not mean that you get to say what you want to, but everyone else has to keep their opinion to themselves.

We gays have fought too hard and too long to allow people like you to destroy the very foundations of which this country was founded upon by taking someones FREEDOM OF SPEECH, no matter if that is Hate speech or not, away, because they will Next come and take OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH away as well, History Proves that.

In the Movie, "The American President", a Show that Stands UP for the Liberal Ideal of American Life, disagrees with you on this as well:
"America isn't easy. America is advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad, 'cause it's gonna put up a fight. It's gonna say "You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours. You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country can't just be a flag; the symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. Then, you can stand up and sing about the "land of the free"."

YOU WANT YOUR Freedoms? Then you Have to Stand up for O'Reilly's Freedoms to Speak His Mind, no Matter How Idiotic he IS, As Well.
idea
-- Posted by Ed Pfaff on Thu, May 17, 2007, 11:47 pm EST

report this comment



How can you defend anyone that would not pass Jessica's law. This is not a Lippert is gay thing...Who cares, not O' Reilly. O' Reilly may be loud and sometimes obnoxious, but, the mandatory sentence should hold. By the way Lippert saying "Vermont has the toughest laws" regarding sexual predators is WRONG!! Either he is consciously lying or he just is ignorant. Signed, a concerned citizen.
-- Posted by Dave Carlson on Thu, May 17, 2007, 11:42 pm EST

report this comment



My guess: the O'Reilly-ites haven't read the editorial to start with; guess you didn't have time with all the mutual admiration society meetings, right? And BTW, the editorial never claimed that O'Reilly *identified* Lippert as gay. But I guess you know that, right? You can read, right? Right? OH SORRY! You watch Fox News too much to read, right?
-- Posted by Cary Redmont on Thu, May 17, 2007, 10:03 pm EST

report this comment



Hey Bill Lofy, where is the mention of Jessica's Law in your commentary? That's the reason for what happened the other day. It had nothing to do with bigotry and you know it. You just can't admit that Bill O'Reilly is right about this issue. One must assume that you are OK with a person raping a five-year-old only getting probation.

Stop calling people bigots. Instead, you should seriously wonder why you support child rapist.

You are one sick person.
-- Posted by Ken Nambu on Thu, May 17, 2007, 11:30 pm EST

report this comment



Until I learned about your pastime of molesting small children, I thought my state of California was the most screwed-up State in the Union. But Vermonters have demonstrated that they've got us beat!

. . . and I always thought that there was no newspaper in the U.S. that could exceed the S.F. Chronicle, the L.A. Times and the Sacramento Bee where the lack of journalistic integrity was concerned, but the puny little ol' Rutland Herald is right up there with the big boys where dishonesty, distortion and a total lack of credibility is concerned.

Congratulations! You guys have made to the bottom of the septic tank.
-- Posted by James Ricketts on Thu, May 17, 2007, 11:00 pm EST

report this comment



It's interesting that you say that hate has no place in Vermont by smearing Bill O'Reilly as a gay bigot with no facts to back it up.

I think it is you Randal Smathers that is the hater. It's really sad and pathetic.
-- Posted by Sallie Roberts on Thu, May 17, 2007, 9:05 pm EST

report this comment



If anyone is bigoted, it is the Rutland Herald. I saw the interview and the fact that Lippert is gay did not come up. In fact, you were the one to bring up the gay issue. The Rutland Herald should be ashamed of itself for twisting the truth.

It's about molesting kids and your state is soft on predators. Period!
-- Posted by John Patriot on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:59 pm EST

report this comment



I watched the show you speak of in your column and not at any time was a reference made to GAYs , shame, shame on you, Rutland Herald. You would get more subscribers if you told the truth.
-- Posted by Jack October on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:58 pm EST

report this comment



"Bill Lofy is a communications consultant from Jericho whose clients include the leadership of the Vermont House and Senate."

What else has this "concerned Vermonter" done?

-Vermont Democratic Party Coordinated Campaign Communications Director

-Scudder Parker's spokesman.

-Vermont Democratic Party consultant

-Democratic Party spokesman

Also happens to reside in Jericho, Vt....the same town as Symington (VT Speaker of the House) who took up for Lippert on the House Floor.

folks from out-of-state need to realize the MAJORITY of REAL VERMONTERS are outraged by our "representatives". The past session was out of control with stupidity unlike anything we have ever seen. We had hearing on "global warming" during 3ft snow storms, Cindy Sheehan was praised and now this nonsense.
We are fighting an uphill battle to replace every single one of these people who have invaded our government.
-- Posted by Rob Ashton on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:55 pm EST

report this comment



I saw Mr.O'Reilly's show the other night and not a word was said about Mr. Lippert being gay. I would not have know that, even if I cared, until your article. What I have a problem with is your attacking Mr. O'Reilly about his efforts to protect young children and the punishment for these sexual degenerates. By your article, you support Mr. Lippert in his actions, which is deplorable. There is also one more point. During the attempted interview with Mr. Lippert, did you notice the actions of his counterparts? I thought liberals welcomed open discourse. I guess I was wrong. Wayne
-- Posted by wayne mosdell on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:52 pm EST

report this comment



Shame, shame, shame Jessica's law should be passed. Have children would never vacation or live in Vermont. Prettiest state in the USA. Very sad.














Richard C. Guliano
-- Posted by Richard Guliano on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:47 pm EST

report this comment



Very well said Colin, I feel bad for the Good people of VT, what a joke these SP's have made of your state...Good Luck up there...
-- Posted by Mark Thompson on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:37 pm EST

report this comment



As a survivor of molestation as a child, I have to say how sad and sick I am for the Children of Vermont. Children are the most innocent in our society to be protected completely and the sick perverts who prey on them should have no chances to repeat offend (and they will). A minimum sentence of 25 years is not long enough. There should be no discussion on the issue and no three strikes and you're out - the first touch is the last touch. The chances are very good that for every child who does report the molestation, there are probably at least a dozen that haven't. These perverts leave a trail of tears behind them, stealing childhoods as they go.

For Mr. Lippert to feel that five years (maybe depending on the judge) is adequate for these lower life forms is absolutely ridiculous. And for you, Mr. Lofy, to throw in the red herring about Mr. Lippert being gay and that's the only reason he is being questioned about his stand, is without a doubt, the most idiotic thing I have ever read. Mr. Lippert must believe that the people of Vermont are morons and incapable of understanding such advanced thinking.

I only hope and pray that no one of his acquaintence ever experiences what I did because they won't get much help from him.
-- Posted by Calgarycitygirl on Thu, May 17, 2007, 5:08 pm EST

report this comment



It is unfortunate that Rep. Lippert received unsettling e-mails since the O'Reilly program earlier this week. However, it might help if you reviewed exactly how Mr. O'Reilly started pushing Jessica's Law in every state. Jessica was one of many children sexually assaulted and murdered in rapidally increasing numbers a few years ago. Jessica's murder was one of the most brutal. In every case, the murderer had been arrested previously for crimes against children, with little punishment. Mr. O'Reilly raged against the leniency that allowed the assailants to become increasingly more bold until they murdered.
Mr. O'Reilly will not cease in his endeavors to protect children.
Mr. O'Reilly is not against gays.
Mr. Jesse Waters sounds like an 18 year old, and is as far from menacing as a person can be.
Thank you
Joann Brown from
Massachusetts
-- Posted by Joann Brown on Thu, May 17, 2007, 4:56 pm EST

report this comment



Re: O’Reilly Commentary

Sir-

The only bigots are you (Lofty) and Rep. Bill Lippert. You among many other liberal socialist will be the downfall of this “Great Nation”. You are a disgrace!!!

SD Mendenhall


cry
-- Posted by SD Mendenhall on Thu, May 17, 2007, 3:19 pm EST

report this comment



Mr Lofy, Your article states that vermont has no room for bigots like Mr. O'Reilly, I say that the good citizens of Vermont need to stand up and let the legislature know that they will have no representative that is going to protect child molesters! I hope that the families in Vermont with children will stand up to this legislature in this sp state and demand that Jessica's law be passed. How can anyone say that a child molester should not receive the maximum sentence of 25 years? This has absolutely nothing to do with Mr Lippert's sexual orientation..just the fact that you even mentioned that Mr Lofy shows your lack of intellect.
-- Posted by Keisha Roark on Thu, May 17, 2007, 1:50 pm EST

report this comment



re: Editorial
"O'reillys bigotry........Jessica's Law"

I have never heard of your newspaper until today. I heard about it on O'relly at noon today. I just read your editorial with interest about Mr. Lippert.

It seems to me from your edictorial that if "O'Reilly's 'bigotry' has no place in Vermont, sexual perversion and child abuse apparently do. Is this what you people really think up there in Vermont??
FC House
-- Posted by CRIS HOUSE on Thu, May 17, 2007, 1:47 pm EST

report this comment



Your paper publishes this crap? No wonder print media subscriptions continue to decline. The political correctness and bias of organizations like yours is so obvious. Where and when did O'Reilly say anything about anti-gay? You should ask Lofy to write an apology to O'Reilly.
-- Posted by Rich Silva on Thu, May 17, 2007, 1:31 pm EST

report this comment



You Lofy are a vile human being for printing lies like that. No where did Bill O'Reilly or FOX talk about this guy being gay. Your making all this up because he received some emails from some wackos. VT is a socialist state and full of these child predator supports. I encourage everyone to drop their subscriptions to this lefist newspaper for printing this garbage.
-- Posted by cris parker on Thu, May 17, 2007, 1:26 pm EST

report this comment



Mr Lofy:
I watched and listened to Rep Lippert's confrontation with the "O'Reilly Factor" and heard nothing menacing, inappropriate or "homophobic".
As was noted in the above commentary, Mr O'Reilly was in favor of the legislation protecting trans-gendered people.
If Vermont has such stiff penalties for the sexual abuse of children, then why did Judge Cashman two years ago sentence a man who had raped a 10 year old girl 50 times plus making her available to a friend get sentenced to 60 days in jail.
If you're going to try the "so he could get treatment routine", you're talking to the wrong guy. I worked at Friends Hospital for 27 years with sexually abused patients. The Sexual abuse perpetrator is one of the hardest disorders to treat.
In addition to that the "man" who did this to her has condemned her to a whole lot or
suffering.
Judging by the evidence of the Cashman case. the Howar case and the reluctance of the state legislature to enact strong anti-child molestation laws, I sense that something is rotten in the state of Vermont.
Gus Owens
-- Posted by Gus Owens on Thu, May 17, 2007, 1:19 pm EST

report this comment



No. I think 'tis you Bill Lofy "communications consultant" who fails to understand. Who hires you? looks to me like your pushing the same old tired nonsense that everyone understands quite well. Your a verbal rubber stamp for the loony left. I know it, you know it, we all know it. There was nothing anti-gay in the reporters questions. Seemed to me lippert couldn't handle himself when asked a question he didn't like. Looked to me like everyone ran over to protect gay little Bill from the big, bad O'Reilly Factor. Thats the communication I got. O'Reilly stated he supports transgender protection. What he dosen't get is the restorative justice stance that allows a girl to be ........ (you fill in the blank) over a four year period and the man gets sixty days and "treatment"!!! A small boy is molested ten times and the creep gets a $22 fine and "treatment". The communitation is quite clear. Creeps walk. By the way, we have gay friends who are not interested in their children being subjected to molesters who recieve $22 fines.
Colin Bridge
-- Posted by Colin Bridge on Thu, May 17, 2007, 8:13 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout